Do you see a risk [music]
in our seeding decision-making control
to large, powerful AI models?
>> The The risk you've outlined is
architecturally
controllable.
>> There is some authentic concern out
there um which I wonder whether you I
sympathize with, empathize with, have
any consideration for the risks of
outsourcing data analysis and
decision-making based on data analysis
to a machine algorithm. Do you see a
risk in our seeding decision-making
control to large, powerful AI models who
of course, while smart, are not human?
>> Um the Look, the there are there's a the
general risk of what happens when the
computer takes over. Then there's the
intermediate risk of which is what
you're talking about. But But again, the
the risk you've outlined is
architecturally
controllable.
Your Your enterprise, for example, our
product will allow you to granularly
control what things are controlled by
the computer, what things are controlled
by algorithms.
There's something in software called a
write function, meaning who gets to have
the decision. This can be controlled
down to this individual, sub-individual
in this role.
But you need the right product to do it.
And so a lot of the Not all, but a lot
of the concerns in this area are because
your software is software that was built
for a world that was non-disjointed,
peaceful, where your software product
was primarily sales, where you were not
had did not have an enterprise where
software and software-defined products,
both in military and commercial, powered
to to some extent by AI, where that was
not the case. And so one of the big
problems with reducing everything to a
moral discussion is
in many cases, the moral discussion is
actually masks in intellectual and
commercial engineering ineptitude. So,
it's like these are These are These are
engineering problems.
>> So, is this about messaging then? Is
this about communicating
>> No, it's about the engineering actually
working. It's not a messaging problem.
It's like And that's again why a small
culture, whether it's Silicon Valley or
the Emirates, massively outperforms a
larger culture because
there are moral and and equity issues
here, no doubt. But a lot of the issues
we pretend are moral are actually
engineering. The Who controls the AI?
Under what conditions can it write to
something?
Uh Who What kind of decisions can be
made on the battlefield? Who gets to
decide between life and death? Is very
similar, it not morally, not
intellectually, but technically, who
controls where the satellite flies? Who
tasks the satellite? Is it a human? Is
it a computer? Under what conditions
should it be?
Well, there's a lot It depends the
context. So, you know, if you're running
a massive
agricultural arm, you probably want the
business person to say, "I want to
expand this amount of resources on
satellite coverage." In return, that
that's not a moral decision. It's a It's
a competence decision. If you make it
incorrectly, you will be defeated by the
person installing a better product.