1
00:00:00,400 --> 00:00:02,717
Is America going to win the AI race?

2
00:00:02,800 --> 00:00:05,117
>> There are three
obvious threats right now.

3
00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:09,437
>> Is China winning the global race
to develop artificial intelligence

4
00:00:09,520 --> 00:00:13,517
technology? >> So, how far ahead
of China do you think we are?

5
00:00:13,600 --> 00:00:15,037
>> Overall, I would say

6
00:00:15,120 --> 00:00:19,437
>> China put in 172 gawatt of solar last

7
00:00:19,520 --> 00:00:21,597
year, I think is the number. It's

8
00:00:21,680 --> 00:00:24,557
remarkable. We needed in our calculation

9
00:00:24,640 --> 00:00:29,677
by 2030 92 gawatt to be built. A big

10
00:00:29,760 --> 00:00:31,597
nuclear power plant is somewhere between

11
00:00:31,680 --> 00:00:35,197
1 and 1 1/2 gawatt. The country needs

12
00:00:35,280 --> 00:00:39,037
more energy. And if we don't get more
energy, we're not going to be able to

13
00:00:39,120 --> 00:00:41,517
fully exploit the lead we have in AI and

14
00:00:41,600 --> 00:00:48,157
AGI. It's very clear.
It's probably the case that

15
00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:52,840
>> now that's a moonshot,
ladies and gentlemen.

16
00:00:53,200 --> 00:00:57,117
>> Hey everybody, welcome to part two
of Eric Schmidt week on moonshots. In this

17
00:00:57,200 --> 00:00:59,517
episode, my moonshot mate Dave Blondon

18
00:00:59,600 --> 00:01:01,837
is interviewing Eric Schmidt about US

19
00:01:01,920 --> 00:01:04,637
versus China and how to avoid crisis

20
00:01:04,720 --> 00:01:06,797
during this period of hyperexponential

21
00:01:06,880 --> 00:01:10,797
growth in AI. A heads up, uh, this this

22
00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:14,477
audio recording from Eric is a little
bit choppy. He was on Wi-Fi from his

23
00:01:14,560 --> 00:01:18,877
hotel room, but guarantee you
the content is valuable, so please listen

24
00:01:18,960 --> 00:01:22,557
in. And also, this was recorded about
a month ago. It took us a while to get the

25
00:01:22,640 --> 00:01:24,797
footage out to all of you. All right,

26
00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:30,680
let's jump in this episode
with Dave Blondon and Eric Schmidt.

27
00:01:32,960 --> 00:01:37,117
So, why don't I start you with uh
is America going to win the AI race?

28
00:01:37,200 --> 00:01:41,197
Because I know that's a topic that you've
spoken on quite a bit. It's also

29
00:01:41,280 --> 00:01:45,837
addressed a little bit in your new book,
Genesis, AI, Hope, uh and the human

30
00:01:45,920 --> 00:01:50,077
spirit, uh which hopefully everybody
will read, uh with Henry Kissinger,

31
00:01:50,160 --> 00:01:53,437
actually as a co-author. So, uh are we
going to win the AI race? And you know

32
00:01:53,520 --> 00:01:55,997
what are the scenarios
where we win and lose?

33
00:01:56,080 --> 00:01:59,277
>> It looks like we will.
And um and let me

34
00:01:59,360 --> 00:02:01,357
define like

35
00:02:01,440 --> 00:02:03,917
so I think the San Francisco consensus

36
00:02:04,000 --> 00:02:06,717
which is I call it is what people in San

37
00:02:06,800 --> 00:02:11,197
Francisco believe which charity was you

38
00:02:11,280 --> 00:02:14,797
is that you're going to see a build from

39
00:02:14,880 --> 00:02:18,797
current agentic concion to various forms

40
00:02:18,880 --> 00:02:21,117
of recursive self-improvement to

41
00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:24,477
eventual AGI and super intelligence.

42
00:02:24,560 --> 00:02:26,637
Um, in order to do that, of course, I

43
00:02:26,720 --> 00:02:29,277
need to use enormous amount of hardware.

44
00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:32,797
Uh, Google TPUs, uh, the biggest
ships and silver, and everybody in the

45
00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:35,917
audience knows that. It sure looks like

46
00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:38,797
the hardware restrictions that the Trump

47
00:02:38,880 --> 00:02:43,357
and Biden administrations have put
on China are going to prevent them from

48
00:02:43,440 --> 00:02:47,597
competing at that space. I've been
recently in Shanghai for a few days. I

49
00:02:47,680 --> 00:02:51,597
have good relationships with the Chinese
and my conclusion is they're they're

50
00:02:51,680 --> 00:02:53,517
they're fighting a different game.

51
00:02:53,600 --> 00:02:55,917
They're ready to adopt AI in every

52
00:02:56,000 --> 00:02:58,877
product, every service, everything, but

53
00:02:58,960 --> 00:03:01,277
in a more classical way. But the merit

54
00:03:01,360 --> 00:03:04,237
is going to seek for AGI. I was quite

55
00:03:04,320 --> 00:03:05,997
worried that we would end up in a super

56
00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:08,317
intelligence race where you would end up

57
00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:11,677
with such enormous gains that one side

58
00:03:11,760 --> 00:03:15,720
would have to actually pre-mp.

59
00:03:18,480 --> 00:03:23,197
It looks like that fear from me was not
well grounded. In fact, I think we're

60
00:03:23,280 --> 00:03:25,037
going to be okay for a few years.

61
00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:28,477
>> Really? What What about robotics?
We seem to be pretty far behind in that

62
00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:31,917
front. >> Yeah.
If if if it's okay for me to be

63
00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:35,437
completely blunt, um the Chinese are

64
00:03:35,520 --> 00:03:37,277
doing the same thing in robotics that

65
00:03:37,360 --> 00:03:39,757
they have done in electronic vehicles.

66
00:03:39,840 --> 00:03:42,557
Um, in case you're confused, while the

67
00:03:42,640 --> 00:03:45,357
current government in the US gets rid of

68
00:03:45,440 --> 00:03:48,477
solar and wind subsidies and promos,

69
00:03:48,560 --> 00:03:52,957
China put in 172 gawatt of solar last

70
00:03:53,040 --> 00:03:55,117
year, I think is the number. It's

71
00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:56,717
remarkable.

72
00:03:56,800 --> 00:04:00,797
So, the the Chinese race around uh solar

73
00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:03,037
and EVs, electronic vehicles of one kind

74
00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:05,517
or another, looks like they've won.

75
00:04:05,600 --> 00:04:09,997
They're using all of those technologies,
in particular, new ways of building

76
00:04:10,080 --> 00:04:13,837
stepper motors and other very
inexpensive, very powerful, you know,

77
00:04:13,920 --> 00:04:16,317
physical things. Good example is Unitry

78
00:04:16,400 --> 00:04:20,157
just launched the R1 uh for $6,000

79
00:04:20,240 --> 00:04:22,397
available in December. I'm I've ordered

80
00:04:22,480 --> 00:04:24,957
one. We'll see how good it is. But the

81
00:04:25,040 --> 00:04:30,237
arrival of humanoid robots um is likely
to be dominated by China. I'm not

82
00:04:30,320 --> 00:04:34,957
suggesting there won't be areas where
the US will play. uh the US will still

83
00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:39,597
have spaces of very high-end, very
sophisticated stuff. Our software is so

84
00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:43,357
much better than the Chinese software,
but at the hardware level, I think you

85
00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:47,037
should assume that the world
will be a wash in inexpensive

86
00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:49,357
Chinese robots in the same sense that

87
00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:51,357
there'll be a wash in inexpensive

88
00:04:51,440 --> 00:04:56,637
Chinese electric vehicles. Who knew? And
so this is going to be my last question,

89
00:04:56,720 --> 00:05:00,637
but let me bump it to the front since
you just beautifully segueed into it. In

90
00:05:00,720 --> 00:05:05,917
the race for AGI, but then also
in parallel robotics, uh, China's going to

91
00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:09,757
be miles ahead in electricity production.
And in the very short term,

92
00:05:09,840 --> 00:05:13,037
we're all going to be chip constrained,
TPU constrained. But if you look 3 four

93
00:05:13,120 --> 00:05:17,117
years out, they, you know, the the fabs
are running at full throttle, the chips

94
00:05:17,200 --> 00:05:21,677
are coming out by the millions, then
you're suddenly electricity constrained.

95
00:05:21,760 --> 00:05:24,957
uh is there a vulnerability
for America there?

96
00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:27,597
>> It's a huge issue. So again, let's use

97
00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:32,797
China versus the US as a metaphor.
What are China's strengths? Uh and I'm not

98
00:05:32,880 --> 00:05:36,717
praising China. I'm just trying
to report it. They have solved their

99
00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:41,517
electric power problem. They also have
full control over social media. So they

100
00:05:41,600 --> 00:05:42,717
don't have the kind of problems that

101
00:05:42,800 --> 00:05:45,677
people here complain about. They have

102
00:05:45,760 --> 00:05:48,717
enormously talented software people and

103
00:05:48,800 --> 00:05:51,597
they don't have enough hardware.

104
00:05:51,680 --> 00:05:53,437
I think that's roughly where they are.

105
00:05:53,520 --> 00:05:56,237
They're also incredible capitalists. Uh

106
00:05:56,320 --> 00:05:59,277
they they call it um Chinese Chinese

107
00:05:59,360 --> 00:06:02,637
socialism with uh socialism with Chinese

108
00:06:02,720 --> 00:06:05,917
characteristics. But trust me, it's pure

109
00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:08,237
raw capitalism. Let's call it what it

110
00:06:08,320 --> 00:06:11,597
is. In the US, we have the many benefits

111
00:06:11,680 --> 00:06:16,157
everybody understands. We do not have
enough electricity and our hard and our

112
00:06:16,240 --> 00:06:17,837
at least in our consumer stuff, the

113
00:06:17,920 --> 00:06:20,317
Chinese are likely to beat us. Our

114
00:06:20,400 --> 00:06:23,197
hardware architectures are fantastic and

115
00:06:23,280 --> 00:06:27,517
I'm including um the Amazon chip,
obviously the embedded chips, the TPU

116
00:06:27,600 --> 00:06:30,157
v5, which I'm happy to say I was part of

117
00:06:30,240 --> 00:06:33,357
TPU version one. Um all of that stuff is

118
00:06:33,440 --> 00:06:37,197
incredible. So, if you
think about it, uh, and I

119
00:06:37,280 --> 00:06:39,437
testified in Congress a month or two ago

120
00:06:39,520 --> 00:06:42,877
on this, we looked at the amount of

121
00:06:42,960 --> 00:06:44,557
electricity required in the United

122
00:06:44,640 --> 00:06:49,837
States to power the expected demand of

123
00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:52,077
data centers and we needed in our

124
00:06:52,160 --> 00:06:55,437
calculation by 2030

125
00:06:55,520 --> 00:06:58,797
92 gawatt to be built. And for

126
00:06:58,880 --> 00:07:01,837
reference, a big nuclear power plant is

127
00:07:01,920 --> 00:07:06,477
somewhere between 1 and 1 and a half
gigaww. To give you a sense at how many

128
00:07:06,560 --> 00:07:07,917
nuclear power plants are getting started

129
00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:11,757
in America, effectively zero. So we had

130
00:07:11,840 --> 00:07:14,637
hoped and I've hoped in my lobbying and

131
00:07:14,720 --> 00:07:19,277
testim testifying that the
government would fast track

132
00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:21,117
availability of all kinds of

133
00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:24,077
electricity. Um and indeed they have

134
00:07:24,160 --> 00:07:26,877
promoted oil and gas, but they've also

135
00:07:26,960 --> 00:07:30,077
hobbled sto um solar and wind to a

136
00:07:30,160 --> 00:07:32,557
terrible degree, which is an error. The

137
00:07:32,640 --> 00:07:36,077
country needs more energy. And if we

138
00:07:36,160 --> 00:07:39,757
don't get more energy, we're not going
to be able to fully exploit the lead we

139
00:07:39,840 --> 00:07:43,037
have in AI and AGI. It's very clear. And

140
00:07:43,120 --> 00:07:46,957
by the way, the obvious next question
is what do we do? Well, there are

141
00:07:47,040 --> 00:07:51,037
scenarios. For example, the president
went to Saudi and the UAE and did huge

142
00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:55,037
deals for multiple gigawatts. And so
we might find ourselves in a situation

143
00:07:55,120 --> 00:07:59,117
where our training for our most
important thing, the thing which are the

144
00:07:59,200 --> 00:08:01,357
the essence of America, which is

145
00:08:01,440 --> 00:08:06,157
American intelligence, is actually being
developed in kingdoms and that may be

146
00:08:06,240 --> 00:08:09,517
the only fall back we have.
>> That is really weird and that begs a

147
00:08:09,600 --> 00:08:13,517
very difficult question.
Do you mind if I ask you a a tough one?

148
00:08:13,600 --> 00:08:16,477
>> Go ahead. Uh I've been, you know, uh

149
00:08:16,560 --> 00:08:18,717
kind of uh inspired by you for most of

150
00:08:18,800 --> 00:08:23,837
my adult life and uh I I really I've

151
00:08:23,920 --> 00:08:27,757
been watching your uh podcast where
you're talking about look when you

152
00:08:27,840 --> 00:08:30,877
remember when you guest lectured Eric
Bolson's class over at Stanford actually

153
00:08:30,960 --> 00:08:33,277
you said when you were running Google
you felt like you made decisions three

154
00:08:33,360 --> 00:08:36,557
times faster than any company on the
planet but then when you got into the

155
00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:40,157
federal government you felt like the
decision-m was onethird as fast as even

156
00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:43,837
a slow company. So from your point
of view, it's like, you know, a tiny

157
00:08:43,920 --> 00:08:47,437
fraction of the pace that we need to move.
But you've been saying recently

158
00:08:47,520 --> 00:08:51,517
that, you know, one of the things
that's inevitable is some kind of an AI

159
00:08:51,600 --> 00:08:54,397
disaster and we're hoping that it's like

160
00:08:54,480 --> 00:08:57,837
a 100 people that die and not a thousand

161
00:08:57,920 --> 00:09:02,797
or 10,000 or a million or or even 100
million. Uh but, you know, suppose that

162
00:09:02,880 --> 00:09:04,077
it does play out that there's a

163
00:09:04,160 --> 00:09:07,437
catastrophe. That's a wake-up call. What

164
00:09:07,520 --> 00:09:10,157
do you want to do with that wakeup call?

165
00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:14,077
What what's the next move for Eric
Schmidt after the wakeup call?

166
00:09:14,160 --> 00:09:18,557
>> Well, so so the background here is
that Dr. Kissinger, Henry, and I spent an

167
00:09:18,640 --> 00:09:21,997
awful lot of time talking about
the period in the 1950s where he was a key

168
00:09:22,080 --> 00:09:24,717
component of all of these things.

169
00:09:24,800 --> 00:09:29,677
And the so so what he did was he used

170
00:09:29,760 --> 00:09:31,437
the fact that we had used the nuclear

171
00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:35,757
bomb to negotiate over about a 15-year

172
00:09:35,840 --> 00:09:38,557
period a set of treaties that restricted

173
00:09:38,640 --> 00:09:40,637
nuclear proliferation.

174
00:09:40,720 --> 00:09:44,477
Those treaties when they were um

175
00:09:44,560 --> 00:09:47,357
uh when they were negotiated have

176
00:09:47,440 --> 00:09:52,157
allowed us to be alive today. So these
were centrally important without but

177
00:09:52,240 --> 00:09:55,517
without without controlling the spread
of enriched uranium and the other

178
00:09:55,600 --> 00:09:57,837
secrets we would all be toast literally

179
00:09:57,920 --> 00:10:00,397
because of crazy people and so forth. Is

180
00:10:00,480 --> 00:10:02,717
there an analogous set of things that we

181
00:10:02,800 --> 00:10:07,757
can do? The problem here is or I guess
the good news is we're not in a war. We

182
00:10:07,840 --> 00:10:11,117
haven't had a nuclear bomb. We don't
have that thing to discuss. So we can

183
00:10:11,200 --> 00:10:15,597
talk about it but governments tend
to act reactively. So let me talk. There

184
00:10:15,680 --> 00:10:19,117
are three obvious threats right
now which I think are fairly well

185
00:10:19,200 --> 00:10:21,757
understood. The first is misinformation

186
00:10:21,840 --> 00:10:23,437
and the software that we're all

187
00:10:23,520 --> 00:10:27,037
collectively giving people. Um allows

188
00:10:27,120 --> 00:10:31,677
for all sorts of misinformation, fake
videos, fake news, what have you. We all

189
00:10:31,760 --> 00:10:33,997
understand this. It's all open source.

190
00:10:34,080 --> 00:10:37,757
That's done. That's a threat
to democracies and maybe to dictatorships,

191
00:10:37,840 --> 00:10:42,157
but certainly to democracies. The second
one is cyber. And I think one way to

192
00:10:42,240 --> 00:10:45,917
understand cyber is that if you can
write code, you can also write cyber

193
00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:49,037
cyber attacks. It's the same logic. And

194
00:10:49,120 --> 00:10:51,437
you have these incredible gains in

195
00:10:51,520 --> 00:10:56,237
software. It's frightening how good
these so remember my career is as a

196
00:10:56,320 --> 00:11:00,077
programmer. These things program better
than I ever did. It's like shocking,

197
00:11:00,160 --> 00:11:02,957
right? And then the third one is bio.

198
00:11:03,040 --> 00:11:05,197
And I think most people believe that one

199
00:11:05,280 --> 00:11:08,237
of those three will create some kind of

200
00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:11,117
mini crisis that will then cause the

201
00:11:11,200 --> 00:11:15,357
governments to say, "Hang on, let's have
a conversation about how to really deal

202
00:11:15,440 --> 00:11:20,317
with the downsides." The upsides are
incredible, right? And I want America to

203
00:11:20,400 --> 00:11:23,437
win, and I want us to run as fast as we
can. And we're indeed doing that with

204
00:11:23,520 --> 00:11:27,917
the Trump administration, which is great,
right? But we have to be aware

205
00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:31,597
that these pos these things are possible.
Um the one I'm particularly

206
00:11:31,680 --> 00:11:34,557
worried about is biological and he
goes something like this. You take some

207
00:11:34,640 --> 00:11:39,117
existing pathogen and using biological
techniques which I won't discuss. You

208
00:11:39,200 --> 00:11:43,117
can modify it enough that it cannot be
detected but it's still quite dangerous.

209
00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:45,917
That's an example of a threat.
There are many others.

210
00:11:46,000 --> 00:11:48,717
>> Yeah, that's also the easiest I think

211
00:11:48,800 --> 00:11:51,917
which is scary um of of the immediate

212
00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:56,797
you know CBRN threat threats. So cyber,
biological, radiological, nuclear. uh

213
00:11:56,880 --> 00:11:59,677
biological is the one you can kind of do
in a basement with three people, but

214
00:11:59,760 --> 00:12:01,197
it's also the one that's hardest to

215
00:12:01,280 --> 00:12:04,477
contain. So anyway, uh I hope the theory

216
00:12:04,560 --> 00:12:06,957
is right. So, so then uh how do you deal

217
00:12:07,040 --> 00:12:09,037
with proliferation? You know, the Biden

218
00:12:09,120 --> 00:12:12,637
approach was okay, let's contain AGI to

219
00:12:12,720 --> 00:12:16,397
these five companies, you know, Google
being one of them, and then let's say

220
00:12:16,480 --> 00:12:21,117
any model with over 1 26 training
flops has to register with the federal

221
00:12:21,200 --> 00:12:25,757
government. And then we'll keep it all
contained. Uh, so that all got scrapped

222
00:12:25,840 --> 00:12:29,197
immediately, you know, after
the election and got replaced by the new

223
00:12:29,280 --> 00:12:33,037
David Saxs document, which the David
Sachs document is much more about how do

224
00:12:33,120 --> 00:12:35,837
we move as quickly as possible and and

225
00:12:35,920 --> 00:12:38,637
win the race. Um, but it doesn't really

226
00:12:38,720 --> 00:12:43,037
address proliferation. And obviously
in America, we want startups uh and

227
00:12:43,120 --> 00:12:47,917
researchers to have incredible access
to technology and compute. On the other

228
00:12:48,000 --> 00:12:51,997
hand, you know, the three people in a
basement making a biological weapon is

229
00:12:52,080 --> 00:12:55,677
is a real scary thing.
So, how do you balance those?

230
00:12:55,760 --> 00:12:59,437
>> It turns out if you read the David
Saxs President Trump announcement, they're

231
00:12:59,520 --> 00:13:01,917
very clear that they want to continue to

232
00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:04,797
study the security aspects

233
00:13:04,880 --> 00:13:07,037
of AI, especially in a geopolitical way.

234
00:13:07,120 --> 00:13:09,997
And that's code for China versus the US.

235
00:13:10,080 --> 00:13:14,317
And so, they continue in their proposal
to fund things involving nation state

236
00:13:14,400 --> 00:13:16,557
attacks and so forth and so on. and I

237
00:13:16,640 --> 00:13:19,517
fully support that kind of stuff. Um,

238
00:13:19,600 --> 00:13:23,757
there's probably a difference
on the misinformation social media stuff

239
00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:26,237
between the two, but for example, the

240
00:13:26,320 --> 00:13:30,957
Biden rule was simply that you had to
report if you're doing a training run 10

241
00:13:31,040 --> 00:13:34,957
to the 26 or greater. I was part of the
group that made that number up. Uh, we

242
00:13:35,040 --> 00:13:38,157
made it up because we had no better
number. I'm not suggesting it's the

243
00:13:38,240 --> 00:13:41,197
right number. And the the conclusion you

244
00:13:41,280 --> 00:13:43,757
come to is

245
00:13:43,840 --> 00:13:48,477
it's probably the case that that we know

246
00:13:48,560 --> 00:13:52,237
our government, I don't know this,
but I'm guessing knows where the training

247
00:13:52,320 --> 00:13:55,197
runs are going on in in China because of

248
00:13:55,280 --> 00:13:57,757
espionage. And it's probably the case

249
00:13:57,840 --> 00:14:02,957
that the Chinese have espionage on the US
knowing where our training runs are.

250
00:14:03,040 --> 00:14:07,517
So I'm not sure the nature of the
training run runs is a secret. And

251
00:14:07,600 --> 00:14:09,597
frankly, everybody knows where the data

252
00:14:09,680 --> 00:14:12,557
centers are cuz they're immense. So, uh,

253
00:14:12,640 --> 00:14:15,197
we will see. Another attack on the 1026

254
00:14:15,280 --> 00:14:20,477
is that the training is getting more um
more costefficient. If you look at the

255
00:14:20,560 --> 00:14:25,597
moving, they move from something called
FP16 to FP8. That means eight precision

256
00:14:25,680 --> 00:14:29,117
floating point. People are now moving
to four fourbit floating point, which is

257
00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:31,837
bizarre. It turns out these training

258
00:14:31,920 --> 00:14:35,117
algorithms seem to be quite tolerant for

259
00:14:35,200 --> 00:14:39,997
floating point impre imprecision which
is a shock to me. So again we're getting

260
00:14:40,080 --> 00:14:44,157
more efficient in training. This creates
more of a proliferation problem. If I

261
00:14:44,240 --> 00:14:48,157
can if I can say in general
the proliferation issue I'm not worried

262
00:14:48,240 --> 00:14:50,797
about big companies in big countries

263
00:14:50,880 --> 00:14:52,877
because I can count them. You know

264
00:14:52,960 --> 00:14:57,917
there'll be 10 huge data centers, 10
huge training runs around the world. I'm

265
00:14:58,000 --> 00:15:02,557
much more worried about the open- source
groups which can operate in the shadows.

266
00:15:02,640 --> 00:15:03,997
They don't have to solve every problem.

267
00:15:04,080 --> 00:15:05,917
They just have to do one thing well.

268
00:15:06,000 --> 00:15:09,277
They can patch together the open source
which is generally available and it's

269
00:15:09,360 --> 00:15:11,437
good enough. If you look at the quality

270
00:15:11,520 --> 00:15:15,357
of DeepS are R are one and now R2

271
00:15:15,440 --> 00:15:18,077
coming. Sure looks like it's in 80 or

272
00:15:18,160 --> 00:15:22,637
90% of these top closed models.
The closed models people, which obviously

273
00:15:22,720 --> 00:15:26,877
includes Google, get very defensive over
this because they say, "Look, those are

274
00:15:26,960 --> 00:15:30,717
kind of synthetic. They have diffused
the models. They've trained our best

275
00:15:30,800 --> 00:15:34,557
information. They're not." All of that
is true. They're correct, but they are

276
00:15:34,640 --> 00:15:37,037
nevertheless useful for specific things,

277
00:15:37,120 --> 00:15:41,677
and they could be used in a proliferation
issue to do various forms

278
00:15:41,760 --> 00:15:43,917
of cyber and biological attacks.

279
00:15:44,000 --> 00:15:47,357
>> Well, yeah. The current rule of thumb
is that distillation and transfer learning

280
00:15:47,440 --> 00:15:51,837
is about 1% of the cost of the original
training but gets you to the same

281
00:15:51,920 --> 00:15:55,437
destination. So if you take you know FP4
which you mentioned you know we get an

282
00:15:55,520 --> 00:15:58,717
8x performance boost over FP32. So you

283
00:15:58,800 --> 00:16:03,277
get an 8x on the ch on the you know the
the weights and then you've got another

284
00:16:03,360 --> 00:16:07,437
100x on the transfer learning.
And it's really hard to draw an analogy to

285
00:16:07,520 --> 00:16:12,157
nuclear or chemical weapons in the past
cuz you couldn't kind of shrink them a

286
00:16:12,240 --> 00:16:14,397
thousandx under the covers and get the

287
00:16:14,480 --> 00:16:19,437
same result. But AI is really weird that
way. It's it's very compressible, very

288
00:16:19,520 --> 00:16:21,277
fluid.

289
00:16:21,360 --> 00:16:24,637
Uh well, again, we we we will see. Um it

290
00:16:24,720 --> 00:16:27,037
does not look like we have a very good

291
00:16:27,120 --> 00:16:29,517
solution for distillation.

292
00:16:29,600 --> 00:16:32,957
It looks like an opponent of a company

293
00:16:33,040 --> 00:16:35,837
can mask their queries to look like

294
00:16:35,920 --> 00:16:37,917
normal sets of users and then distill

295
00:16:38,000 --> 00:16:40,877
the models. One of my friends has

296
00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:43,677
thought about this a lot and he thinks

297
00:16:43,760 --> 00:16:45,517
that the eventual state in the United

298
00:16:45,600 --> 00:16:48,477
States is that the biggest models will

299
00:16:48,560 --> 00:16:51,597
never be released and that the companies

300
00:16:51,680 --> 00:16:54,557
will distill their own models down for

301
00:16:54,640 --> 00:16:57,197
that reason. That's his opinion. We'll

302
00:16:57,280 --> 00:17:00,157
see if that's true. And this produces a

303
00:17:00,240 --> 00:17:03,037
bizarre outcome where the biggest models

304
00:17:03,120 --> 00:17:05,517
in the United States are closed source

305
00:17:05,600 --> 00:17:07,997
and the biggest models in China are

306
00:17:08,080 --> 00:17:12,637
open- source. And the geopolitical issue
there of course is that open source is

307
00:17:12,720 --> 00:17:17,677
free and the closed source models are
not free. And so the vast majority of

308
00:17:17,760 --> 00:17:21,037
governments and countries who don't have
the kind of money that the west does and

309
00:17:21,120 --> 00:17:24,877
so forth will end up standardizing
on Chinese models not because they're

310
00:17:24,960 --> 00:17:28,397
better, but because they're free. And so
we'll see if that's true or not. But I

311
00:17:28,480 --> 00:17:31,197
do worry about that. >> Well,
this whole topic of distillation

312
00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:35,037
and proliferation is a good segue into
a much happier topic which I really want

313
00:17:35,120 --> 00:17:39,757
to use want to use our remaining time on.
Uh I cannot tell you how inspiring

314
00:17:39,840 --> 00:17:43,677
you are to the founders around
Cambridge, MIT, Harvard, Northeastern

315
00:17:43,760 --> 00:17:47,677
where where all of our talent comes from.
Um, in my perfect world, you would

316
00:17:47,760 --> 00:17:51,757
podcast or say something or publish
something every single day and then

317
00:17:51,840 --> 00:17:56,477
people could turn off CNBC and just tune
into what you say because well, I mean,

318
00:17:56,560 --> 00:18:00,237
aside from it being brilliant, you have
access to knowledge that isn't in anyone

319
00:18:00,320 --> 00:18:01,677
else's brain as far as I can tell.

320
00:18:01,760 --> 00:18:05,997
You've got this really, really unique
combination of perspectives and and it's

321
00:18:06,080 --> 00:18:08,157
incredibly valuable. So, you know, using

322
00:18:08,240 --> 00:18:11,997
distillation and uh as a starting point,

323
00:18:12,080 --> 00:18:15,837
what founder advice would you give? you
know, we're seeing numbers like they're

324
00:18:15,920 --> 00:18:20,157
completely unprecedented at ages
of founders that are also unprecedented. I

325
00:18:20,240 --> 00:18:23,757
mean, you saw Sergey and Larry when they
were very very young, but now they're

326
00:18:23,840 --> 00:18:27,677
even younger. We're talking 18, 19 years
years old now. So, uh, what advice would

327
00:18:27,760 --> 00:18:30,077
you give them?

328
00:18:30,160 --> 00:18:32,077
>> So, I think the the
most important thing

329
00:18:32,160 --> 00:18:35,357
to say is that the barrier to entry to

330
00:18:35,440 --> 00:18:38,237
starting a company is effectively zero

331
00:18:38,320 --> 00:18:41,357
now. So, let's think about it. What do

332
00:18:41,440 --> 00:18:45,597
you need to have a company? You can
register it online. You need some money

333
00:18:45,680 --> 00:18:49,277
to get started. You have to pay yourself.
Um, you don't really need any

334
00:18:49,360 --> 00:18:53,197
programmers. You need
a couple people to w to pay

335
00:18:53,280 --> 00:18:55,517
Google or Claude or what have you to uh

336
00:18:55,600 --> 00:19:00,717
to write the code for you. Um, so you're
pretty good there. You can use third

337
00:19:00,800 --> 00:19:04,637
party logistics companies if you're
building a hardware device and you can

338
00:19:04,720 --> 00:19:09,357
use essentially contract manufacturers
to build whatever hardware device. So it

339
00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:13,117
looks to me like for hardware and
software the barrier to entry is almost

340
00:19:13,200 --> 00:19:16,237
zero. That sounds great until you

341
00:19:16,320 --> 00:19:17,757
realize that as a result you're now

342
00:19:17,840 --> 00:19:20,477
competing against everyone all the time.

343
00:19:20,560 --> 00:19:23,597
So as an example in my career which has

344
00:19:23,680 --> 00:19:26,557
spanned more than I guess 50 55 years

345
00:19:26,640 --> 00:19:29,277
now doing this stuff the key thing

346
00:19:29,360 --> 00:19:32,237
that's true is the compression of time.

347
00:19:32,320 --> 00:19:34,237
The other thing I would say to founders

348
00:19:34,320 --> 00:19:37,037
is it's really important that everything

349
00:19:37,120 --> 00:19:41,357
you do be learned and not uh specified.

350
00:19:41,440 --> 00:19:43,197
I'm doing a couple startups on my own.

351
00:19:43,280 --> 00:19:47,357
We'll see how well they do.
But with them, I say I know nothing. Learn

352
00:19:47,440 --> 00:19:51,517
everything. So you can learn how
to support your customers. You can learn

353
00:19:51,600 --> 00:19:55,197
what the customer wants. You can learn
how to and learning meaning in the AI

354
00:19:55,280 --> 00:19:56,797
sense of learning. Learning it as part

355
00:19:56,880 --> 00:20:00,157
of uh either uh supervised or

356
00:20:00,240 --> 00:20:02,957
unsupervised training. U and if you take

357
00:20:03,040 --> 00:20:04,797
a learning approach then you build a

358
00:20:04,880 --> 00:20:07,997
system that if it works it will explode

359
00:20:08,080 --> 00:20:10,637
>> because once the learning accelerates

360
00:20:10,720 --> 00:20:13,917
you get into a quasi monopoly position.

361
00:20:14,000 --> 00:20:18,717
So the philosophy of winning goes
something like this. Run as fast you can

362
00:20:18,800 --> 00:20:23,117
get there as quickly as you can. Build
it around learning and if it takes off

363
00:20:23,200 --> 00:20:25,677
you'll be a hero because once it learns

364
00:20:25,760 --> 00:20:28,557
it learns how to become stronger. Um,

365
00:20:28,640 --> 00:20:33,437
and eventually two or three years,
you'll start to have various forms of

366
00:20:33,520 --> 00:20:36,637
reinforcement learning
which are self-replicating.

367
00:20:36,720 --> 00:20:40,397
And so then you're likely to get
accelerations further. That's the most

368
00:20:40,480 --> 00:20:42,317
likely path for the next trillion dollar

369
00:20:42,400 --> 00:20:44,637
company past the equivalents of

370
00:20:44,720 --> 00:20:47,837
anthropic, open AI, you know, etc. And

371
00:20:47,920 --> 00:20:52,157
so when you're looking at an investment
yourself, uh, by the way, the the

372
00:20:52,240 --> 00:20:56,077
learning loops concept that Eric just
mentioned on the Moonshots podcast that

373
00:20:56,160 --> 00:20:59,837
we did with Eric, which you can find
online, he actually described in detail

374
00:20:59,920 --> 00:21:03,197
the three or four different types
of learning loops that he looks for. So

375
00:21:03,280 --> 00:21:06,477
it's definitely worth, you know, it's
a lot more than we have time for right

376
00:21:06,560 --> 00:21:08,637
now, but it's really, really brilliant.

377
00:21:08,720 --> 00:21:12,797
So, uh, aside from the actual business
plan and the learning loops, what do you

378
00:21:12,880 --> 00:21:16,877
look for in founder dynamics,
founder team team members?

379
00:21:16,960 --> 00:21:20,477
Um, it's always the case that the that the

380
00:21:20,560 --> 00:21:22,557
founders are really really smart.

381
00:21:22,640 --> 00:21:24,957
They're very very quick and they're very

382
00:21:25,040 --> 00:21:28,397
interesting to talk to. It's also true

383
00:21:28,480 --> 00:21:32,717
that you need them to be able
to hire a network of people like them.

384
00:21:32,800 --> 00:21:36,157
>> And so a simple way is if you talk
to them and they seem really interesting

385
00:21:36,240 --> 00:21:40,317
and really dynamic and you find that
they're in a network of such people, you

386
00:21:40,400 --> 00:21:44,877
likely have winners. And then what you
do is you say to them, show me, don't

387
00:21:44,960 --> 00:21:47,917
tell me the product, which of course
is what they want to talk about. Show me

388
00:21:48,000 --> 00:21:52,877
how you're going to build a system
that is that goes from zero to infinity.

389
00:21:52,960 --> 00:21:56,237
There's a lot of discussion about
0ero to one. And there it's complete

390
00:21:56,320 --> 00:21:58,237
compression. Get that thing done. But

391
00:21:58,320 --> 00:22:00,237
once you have one, how are you going to

392
00:22:00,320 --> 00:22:03,517
scale? Our industry

393
00:22:03,600 --> 00:22:07,917
makes enormous wealth for the founders
when you build a platform that is

394
00:22:08,000 --> 00:22:12,877
scaling. That's the lesson. What is the
lesson to offer? Build a platform that

395
00:22:12,960 --> 00:22:14,797
scales if you can't. And a platform is

396
00:22:14,880 --> 00:22:16,877
defined as something which others depend

397
00:22:16,960 --> 00:22:21,277
on that you provide. Right? And the

398
00:22:21,360 --> 00:22:24,877
stronger the platform, the more it is,
the more interconnected it is, the

399
00:22:24,960 --> 00:22:28,477
stronger the network lock in. That's
just generally true. It was true for

400
00:22:28,560 --> 00:22:32,717
Microsoft. It was true for what I did 20
years ago. It's true today. And I think

401
00:22:32,800 --> 00:22:34,077
if you look, I'll give you an example.

402
00:22:34,160 --> 00:22:37,917
Everyone's looking at where are
the economics for the large LLM companies.

403
00:22:38,000 --> 00:22:42,397
They don't have a strong enough network
lockin yet, but you could easily imagine

404
00:22:42,480 --> 00:22:45,677
that they would develop it and I'm sure
they don't tell me what they're doing,

405
00:22:45,760 --> 00:22:48,877
but I'm sure that they have that in the
back of their mind. That's their that's

406
00:22:48,960 --> 00:22:51,757
part of the reasons why
their valuations are so high.

407
00:22:51,840 --> 00:22:56,077
>> So, we have one minute remaining and I
really want to use it to milk you for a

408
00:22:56,160 --> 00:22:58,237
quote that we can loop on our wall in

409
00:22:58,320 --> 00:23:01,757
the office. Um, and I it would the

410
00:23:01,840 --> 00:23:03,677
perfect quote to me would be about the

411
00:23:03,760 --> 00:23:06,157
importance of this moment in time. And

412
00:23:06,240 --> 00:23:11,357
so many of the founders uh they weren't
around when Microsoft could, you know,

413
00:23:11,440 --> 00:23:13,997
Bill Gates could wake up in the morning
and decide, hey, I'm going to destroy

414
00:23:14,080 --> 00:23:18,317
Word Perfect today and I'm going to
destroy uh Lotus 123 today cuz they just

415
00:23:18,400 --> 00:23:20,797
had that that that power at that time.

416
00:23:20,880 --> 00:23:25,437
And noll was certainly in that crosshairs,
too. uh then there was this

417
00:23:25,520 --> 00:23:27,597
magical moment of the internet explosion

418
00:23:27,680 --> 00:23:29,357
where companies like Google and many

419
00:23:29,440 --> 00:23:32,957
many others could thrive but then after

420
00:23:33,040 --> 00:23:36,077
that you know things got static again

421
00:23:36,160 --> 00:23:41,117
and now we're in the most explosive
uh time period for opportunity for

422
00:23:41,200 --> 00:23:45,197
entrepreneurs that I've ever experienced
in my life but very few people remember

423
00:23:45,280 --> 00:23:47,837
all the way back to the internet

424
00:23:47,920 --> 00:23:52,557
explosion era so I'd love to get your
your quote or your thoughts around what

425
00:23:52,640 --> 00:23:56,237
is the importance of this moment in time.

426
00:23:56,320 --> 00:23:58,237
>> So I firmly believe that that the

427
00:23:58,320 --> 00:24:02,317
arrival of nonhuman intelligence, AI

428
00:24:02,400 --> 00:24:05,597
intelligence is at the level of

429
00:24:05,680 --> 00:24:08,397
electricity or the invention of fire,

430
00:24:08,480 --> 00:24:11,197
transportation, etc. in human history.

431
00:24:11,280 --> 00:24:14,317
We are fortunate to be living in a time

432
00:24:14,400 --> 00:24:19,197
of great historical consequence. The next
10 years are probably the 10 years

433
00:24:19,280 --> 00:24:22,717
that will have a greater determination
over the next hundred years than

434
00:24:22,800 --> 00:24:24,157
anything before because of the

435
00:24:24,240 --> 00:24:26,877
inventions of these new tools. And the

436
00:24:26,960 --> 00:24:29,837
tools are very very powerful power. And

437
00:24:29,920 --> 00:24:34,317
remember, they're powerful because they
they can equal and in some cases surpass

438
00:24:34,400 --> 00:24:38,957
human intelligence. And human
intelligence is everything for society.

439
00:24:39,040 --> 00:24:43,517
And so the countries and companies
that embrace this non-human intelligence

440
00:24:43,600 --> 00:24:48,157
correctly and aggressively will be
the big winners. And the companies and

441
00:24:48,240 --> 00:24:52,557
countries that are slow or let other
people do it, they will lose because

442
00:24:52,640 --> 00:24:56,077
that the source of excellence,
the source of leadership, the source of

443
00:24:56,160 --> 00:25:00,157
growth, the source of everything,
the source of innovation, everything

444
00:25:00,240 --> 00:25:03,837
economic growth comes from the
application of intelligence to discover

445
00:25:03,920 --> 00:25:08,877
new things, to solve new problems.
We are on a huge course to accelerate that

446
00:25:08,960 --> 00:25:13,960
here in America and I'm
very proud to be part of it.
