1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,597
In terms of the AI piece, which is where
a lot of people are trying to figure out

2
00:00:03,680 --> 00:00:07,197
what to do, what do you think isn't
being priced in yet in terms of the

3
00:00:07,280 --> 00:00:10,717
impact AI is going to have on say
the world or just people listening?

4
00:00:10,800 --> 00:00:13,757
>> The I think I think at this point
I think it's pretty clear with it with,

5
00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:17,037
you know, our technology hats on that
like this stuff is really working now,

6
00:00:17,120 --> 00:00:19,757
right? And so there there was this, you
know, kind of, you know, when when there

7
00:00:19,840 --> 00:00:22,797
was a chat GPD moment, you know,
three years ago is only, by the way, only

8
00:00:22,880 --> 00:00:25,597
three years ago, right? That was the chat
GPD moment and and the big question

9
00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:28,637
was all right this this is like
incredibly fun and creative and like we

10
00:00:28,720 --> 00:00:31,917
have machines now that can compose
Shakespeare and silence and rap lyrics

11
00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:34,877
and like you know this is amazing
but then there was there you know there's

12
00:00:34,960 --> 00:00:37,437
this sort of this big question like can
you can you harness this technology for

13
00:00:37,520 --> 00:00:40,717
reasoning and for you know problem
solving and in domains that like really

14
00:00:40,800 --> 00:00:45,117
matter you know medicine and science
and and and law and so forth and and you

15
00:00:45,200 --> 00:00:48,477
know it turns out the answer to that is
yes right and you know the the last 12

16
00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:51,197
months and especially the last even just
the last three months have really proven

17
00:00:51,280 --> 00:00:54,477
that like AI can really do like you
I mean, you're seeing it all now. You

18
00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:57,997
know, you can actually, you know, AI
is now developing new math theorems. You

19
00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:00,797
know, there, you know, over the holiday
break, you know, there's sort of the

20
00:01:00,880 --> 00:01:03,757
what it feels like the AI coding thing,
you know, really hit critical mass. And

21
00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:07,197
the world's best, the world's best
programmers, right, including like Linus

22
00:01:07,280 --> 00:01:10,077
Turbalds, you know, for for the first
time over the holiday break, basically

23
00:01:10,160 --> 00:01:13,197
said, yeah, AI is now coding better than
we can. And so that, you know, that's

24
00:01:13,280 --> 00:01:15,277
that's incredibly incredibly powerful.

25
00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:18,077
And I think we we all, you know, kind of,
I think, assume that AI now is going

26
00:01:18,160 --> 00:01:21,677
to get really good at reasoning in in any
domain in which there are verifiable

27
00:01:21,760 --> 00:01:24,477
answers. So that that that you know
that's going to include like many very

28
00:01:24,560 --> 00:01:28,077
important domains. I think the thing
that is not well understood I I think a

29
00:01:28,160 --> 00:01:31,917
lot of people have a I think you know
a lot of people in the industry have kind

30
00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:34,477
of what I would describe as this
one-dimensional thing which is okay as a

31
00:01:34,560 --> 00:01:37,437
result of the technology not working AI
just kind of sweeps sweeps the world and

32
00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:41,117
changes everything. And I think that's
that's kind of the wrong that's kind of

33
00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:44,077
the wrong frame. I think it's based on
incomplete understanding of of the world

34
00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:46,717
that we live in or the world that we've
been living in for the last you know 80

35
00:01:46,800 --> 00:01:50,077
years. And I would call out two things
in particular. So one is it has I think

36
00:01:50,160 --> 00:01:53,917
it's felt to us like in the US and the
west for the last you know whatever 30

37
00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:56,957
years or 50 years it's felt like we've
been in a time of great technological

38
00:01:57,040 --> 00:02:00,877
change but actually if you look
for actually evidence of that like in stat

39
00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:03,757
in statistical evidence of that
analytical evidence of that like you

40
00:02:03,840 --> 00:02:07,517
basically can't find it and in
particular economists have a way of

41
00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:10,077
measuring the rate of technological
change in the economy that is

42
00:02:10,160 --> 00:02:13,117
productivity growth which which we could
talk about what that means but basically

43
00:02:13,200 --> 00:02:16,637
it's it's a it's sort of the mathematical
expression of the impact of

44
00:02:16,720 --> 00:02:20,317
technology on the economy
And productivity growth for the last 50

45
00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:24,317
years has actually been very low, not
very high. So we all feel like it's been

46
00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:26,397
very high. There's been lots
of technological change. What's actually

47
00:02:26,480 --> 00:02:27,837
happening is it's it's been very low.

48
00:02:27,920 --> 00:02:30,077
And in fact, the pace of productivity

49
00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:32,797
growth like in the US is is running at

50
00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:35,597
like a half of what it in my lifetime in

51
00:02:35,680 --> 00:02:37,437
our lifetimes it's been running at about

52
00:02:37,520 --> 00:02:40,557
a half the pace that it ran in between

53
00:02:40,640 --> 00:02:44,077
1940 and 1970. And so statistically in

54
00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:48,157
the US in the west technology progress
in the economy technology impact in the

55
00:02:48,240 --> 00:02:49,757
economy has actually slowed way down.

56
00:02:49,840 --> 00:02:53,437
And so we you know the AI thing
is is going to hit but it's hitting an

57
00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:56,797
environment in which we we have actually
had almost no technological progress in

58
00:02:56,880 --> 00:02:59,037
the actual economy for a very long time.

59
00:02:59,120 --> 00:03:01,597
So we could talk about that and then
there's this other like just incredible

60
00:03:01,680 --> 00:03:04,557
thing that's happening which is the
the you know sort the de demographic

61
00:03:04,640 --> 00:03:07,837
collapse right it's sort of a western
phenomenon and increasingly global

62
00:03:07,920 --> 00:03:11,997
phenomenon which is you know the rate
of reproduction of the human species is is

63
00:03:12,080 --> 00:03:15,757
in rapid decline and you know there are
many countries you know including the US

64
00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:19,517
where you know the rate of reproduction
is you know under two you know meaning

65
00:03:19,600 --> 00:03:21,997
meaning that you know many many
countries around the world by the way

66
00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:25,757
including China which is a really big
deal are actually going to depopulate

67
00:03:25,840 --> 00:03:29,757
over the next century um and so you have
this kind precondition that says there's

68
00:03:29,840 --> 00:03:32,557
actually been very little techn
technological progress happening in the

69
00:03:32,640 --> 00:03:37,597
world and the world is going
to depopulate and so AI is going to enter

70
00:03:37,680 --> 00:03:40,717
the world a world in which those two
things are true and I think it's inc

71
00:03:40,800 --> 00:03:44,317
this is incredibly important because we
actually need AI to work in order to get

72
00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:47,117
productivity growth up which is what
we need to get economic growth up and we

73
00:03:47,200 --> 00:03:49,917
actually need AI to work because we're
going to need you know we're going to

74
00:03:50,000 --> 00:03:52,557
need machines to do all the jobs
that we're not going to have people to do

75
00:03:52,640 --> 00:03:55,197
because we're we're literally going to
depopulate we're going to depopulate the

76
00:03:55,280 --> 00:03:58,157
planet over the next hundred years
and so I I think the interplay of these

77
00:03:58,240 --> 00:04:01,517
factors I is is going to be much more
interesting and and frankly more more

78
00:04:01,600 --> 00:04:05,360
more complex than a lot
of people have been thinking.
