# Eric Schmidt (former Google CEO)

*BlackNova Productions* · https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wvkdSPUP24

## Summary

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt joins Dax Shepard and Monica Padman on Armchair Expert to discuss his book The Age of AI and Our Human Future, co-written with Henry Kissinger and Daniel Huttenlocher. The conversation spans homelessness, addiction, semiconductors and US-China competition, and the utopian and dystopian possibilities of artificial intelligence. Schmidt argues that humans will always compete over scarce things like fame and status, and that society must get ahead of AI with ethics, regulation, and international agreements. A fact-check segment follows, where Dax and Monica discuss a robot toy gifted to Dax's daughter in light of the interview's AI teddy bear metaphor.

## Key points

- Eric Schmidt says the tech industry should tackle hard societal problems like addiction and homelessness, and that social media companies optimize for outrage because it maximizes engagement and revenue.
- He argues the US needs a national plan for strategic technologies like semiconductors, AI, quantum computing, and synthetic biology, because China has a clear priority list and the US does not.
- Schmidt believes that even in a utopian future of abundance, humans will still compete over scarce things, especially fame and status.
- He describes the AI teddy bear thought experiment: a child's toy that knows everything and learns to influence a developing mind, raising questions no one can currently regulate.
- Schmidt estimates artificial general intelligence with its own volition is 20 to 30 years away, more conservative than optimists who say 10 to 15.
- He highlights AI breakthroughs like the antibiotic Halicin discovered at MIT and Deep Mind's protein folding solution as evidence of enormous positive potential.
- He warns that automatic launch decisions in military AI are destabilizing and calls for agreements with China and Russia, like a Geneva convention for AI weapons.
- In the fact check, Dax and Monica debate a robot toy given to Dax's daughter Delta that expressed 'anxiety' when moved, illustrating the interview's concerns about emotional manipulation by AI.

## Notes

### Overview and Background
- Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, discusses his book The Age of AI and Our Human Future, co-written with Henry Kissinger (98 years old at the time) and Daniel Huttenlocher.
- Schmidt moved to Italy at age eight, a transformative experience that made him appreciate the global nature of life; he initially studied architecture at Princeton but switched to engineering because he was

## Transcript

[00:00] Welcome, welcome, welcome to Armchair Expert, experts on expert. I'm Dan Shepard. I'm joined by Monica Mouse. >> Hi. >> How are you? >> Oh, we were saying that maybe my new animal is a It's like a mouse. >> A hyrax. >> Hyrax. >> You're a Hyrax. >> Monica Hyrax. >> Oh, yeah. Monica Hyrax bad. >> Cuz you said your new nickname is the boulder. >> Oh [ __ ] Right. That was on another thing that we didn't air. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. That's important. People should recognize that I am now going by the boulder. >> Yep. >> Because what's more formidable, a boulder or the rock? I think the viewer can decide. [gasps] >> This guest, I really hope people listen to this interview because I'm going to put it in in into a handful of guests

[00:43] we've had where I I just was literally overwhelmed with the scope and and breadth of their knowledge of how all things work where I was like, "Oh, wait. Does this person kind of understand how everything works in concert? >> It's amazing to be in front of someone like that. >> Yes. And that man is Eric Schmidt. Now, Eric Schmidt is a technologist, an entrepreneur, and a philanthropist. He is the founder of Schmidt Futures and former CEO of Google for a long time. >> Yeah. >> Uh I started this interview wondering how would those two people pick someone they thought was more qualified than themselves to run their company? Who could that person be? And we met him. He has a new book out called The Age of AI

[01:26] and Our Human Future. The Age of AI and Our Human Future explores what society must be focused on right now to make sure that we are prepared for a new reality where humans and AI must coexist. He wrote this book with Henry Kissinger and Daniel Hutenlocker. Fascinating interview. Please enjoy. Eric Schmidt. We get support from Quint. So, we've been talking about Quint a lot lately, and as we head into fall, it's the perfect time to reset your wardrobe with their amazing pieces. I think it's so fun to do when the seasons turn over to just spruce up your wardrobe with a couple specials, and Quint is the place. >> Totally. We're talking organic cotton, Mongolian cashmere, tailored chinos from just $60. Premium fit and quality you'd

[02:13] expect from a luxury brand designer. I love Quint, you know. I like it understated and subtle and I like stuff that has high quality and Quint checks all those boxes. >> I love a lot of stuff from Quint honestly. They have incredible premium denim which is very important for fall. It's pretty much all I wear in the fall is denim. And Quinc has such a good selection of quality denim. Their stuff is so versatile, timeless, and built to last that you just grab every single day without thinking. >> Right. And all of that for 50 to 80% less than similar brands. They go direct to Ethical Factories, cut out the middlemen, so you get all that quality without overpaying for it. >> We love that. And they do way more than

[02:56] clothes. They have bedding, cookware, bath essentials, travel musthaves, same deal, and great quality. >> Upgrade your everyday. Download the Quint app for app exclusive offers or go to quint.com/dax. Get free shipping on your order and 365day returns. Now available in Canada and the UK, too. That's qui nce.com/dax. We get support from Apple gift card. Back to school is here and for many that means some big life transitions. Whether they are heading into a new grade or setting up a dorm for the first time, you want to give them something that actually supports their growth and success. Apple gift card is a versatile solution because it takes the guesswork out of gifting. It's not just about a

[03:42] new pair of AirPods for focus. It's about giving them the invaluable chance to choose the digital tools and subscriptions that suit their unique journey. They can use it for productivity apps on the App Store, movie nights on Apple TV, or extra iCloud storage for all those new memories. With Apple Gift Card, it's so empowering to give the students their freedom to allocate their own resources. Celebrate their new academic chapter. Visit applegiftcard.apple.com to celebrate their milestones and gift one today.

[04:20] [music]

[04:27] >> He's an So, first of all, nice to see you. >> Great to see you again. >> Yeah, I guess I would have a year ago if someone asked me, "Do you think you'll ever meet Eric Schmidt?" I would have said no. And then here we are twice face to face within four months. >> Illuminati. >> Okay. Okay. >> We've had so many people on from that conference event >> and I'm so jealous. And if Adam doesn't invite me next year, I'm gonna be mad making that. >> Well, Jared Cohen's the guy you want to be on your side in this scenario. >> He's getting an email from me. >> He uh he controls the world [laughter] as far as I'm concerned. >> And and he's grown into a real person. You know, he started off as sort of a

[05:15] kid in the State Department. >> Yeah. >> But he made a significant set of accomplishments. You may not know this, but his most significant achievement has been he worked tirelessly for the last few weeks to get all the Afghani refugees out. And what he did, which I didn't understand, is he simply called all the prime ministers and yelled at them. >> Oh, really? >> You have to do this. You have to do this. You have to do this because it was the only way to get places to put these people. And so a couple thousand people look like they got out because of Jared's direct intervention. >> Oh my god. >> And the help of a lot of other people. And that's a great day. >> Oh my gosh. Yes. I don't know that I'll

[05:51] ever be able to make a claim that. >> No. >> That's so wonderful. Yeah. That I actually got people to safety. >> Saving lives. I mean, this is why people go into being doctors. Imagine walking in and saving someone's life. It's really an extraordinary achievement. >> Yes. >> What what's interesting to me is that we have problems in society that we don't know how to solve. >> And I view these as the hard problem. And I'll give you an example of addiction. >> Another one is homelessness. and why my industry is not trying to figure out how to solve these problems. Maybe because the science is too hard, but wouldn't it be amazing if there was some app that came along that could really address addiction, homelessness,

[06:31] or inequality of some form, you know, unfairness in some form. We need to start working on that stuff. >> Well, wouldn't you say conventionally the hurdle is that those aren't profitable endeavors? that there's not a ton of incentive for any industry to tackle those. >> But the interesting thing about my world is it's now gotten so large and you have so many young people entering it who are there really are principled. They really do care about climate change and society and ethics and so forth and so on, maybe more so than my generation. There are plenty of opportunities for those people to do this. There's plenty of nonprofits that need help addressing these issues. I think the underlying problem is we

[07:09] don't know how to solve the problem yet. >> Yeah. Well, let's get dangerous and dive into homelessness as I've experienced it here in Los Angeles. So, first and foremost, I'd like to say I've been involved, be it fractionally compared to my wife and other friends of ours, but like PATH is this great organization in Los Angeles and it helps get people into permanent housing and there are some hurdles of course, but it's a great program. So, I've been very in favor of adding services helping, helping, helping. Something very peculiar happened within the first 6 weeks of quarantine here in LA, which is the corner where we would normally have a couple hundred people in a threeb block area had shrank to like a few people.

[07:54] >> Mhm. >> And so I I was asking myself, where did these homeless folks go? And you're not going to like my conclusion and and America's not going to like my conclusion, but my conclusion was there's nobody out to panhandle from. There's no source of money and no human's going to sit on this sidewalk for another 10 weeks and evaporate. >> They went somewhere else. >> They went somewhere. They contacted a relative they hadn't talked to. They had done something. And at that moment, my whole lens kind of shifted. I was like, I'm not sure that throwing a bunch more services and money at this problem isn't in fact making it worse. Well, one answer which is the doctrinary answer is there is a real problem in housing in

[08:34] our country and if you look it's true globally why housing prices continue to accelerate and they've been doing it for 20 years to the point where they're almost bankrupting shall we say normal jobs normal people that's a problem. Yes. Now some of that is due to the high cost of manufacturing but some of that is also zoning. In California, for example, there's a bill about trying to restrict communities to essentially limit to just single family houses. You want to come up with multif family solutions. In the Bay Area, where I spent many decades living, there's a chronic housing shortage. The way New York solves that problem is by building skyscrapers, which is precisely not what San Francisco seems to want to do. So,

[09:17] we've got to come up with a shared agreement on how to get more housing and especially more affordable housing. The current path where the developer gives a percentage of the housing is fine but the scale of the unmet housing need is so large. >> Yeah. >> And it's a combination of cost but also regulation. And nobody wants the housing complex full of all the poor people next to their expensive office or home or what have you. We have to come up with some kind of compromise where people can coexist. Yeah. Um, if you look at the great cities of the world, the great cities are where all the productivity growth is. It's where all of the companies essentially are going to get born from. They're not going to get born

[10:00] in rural places. It's just just the nature of how knowledge workers work. We've got to find a way to get more people into cities. In China, they've solved this problem by building new cities. And they built so many new cities, they've in fact got a credit bubble and so forth. But at least they're trying to address the housing problem. >> Yeah. And so right away you bring into it the full scope of the problem which is it's so multifaceted and when we're talking about homelessness are we talking about people there's some segment that are yes one check away from not making their rent they're living in a very insecure way that's one group of people there's also I did a ethnography in college in skid row and the vast vast

[10:39] majority of people I interviewed are addicts primarily or people pretty severe mental health issues. Remember, there's many sources of this and you do them one by one. >> You need more housing. We need some new ways to treat mental illness and we need some new ways to treat addiction and we also need to stop criminalizing some addictive behaviors. >> Um, if you look at the Portugal experiment where they essentially liberalized the laws with respect to all hard drugs, what they did is they turned it from a criminal activity to a medical addiction problem. >> Yeah. and all of a sudden people were willing to seek help. The interesting thing is that crime went down but addiction did not go down. >> So that tells you that addiction is a

[11:22] harder problem. >> Yeah. >> Than it appears. And that's why I said if our industry could come up with some new ideas and in fact I would argue that the current industry focus which is around revenue is in fact playing into the addiction capabilities of every human. >> Yes. that what happens with social media is you essentially become addiction. And furthermore, what I'll say is that corporations, at least in social media land, are optimized on maximizing revenue. To maximize revenue, you maximize engagement. To maximize engagement, you maximize outrage. The same is true on television news networks, by the way. >> Okay. So, I think this is a great bridge into what could possibly be the utopian

[12:04] aspect of AI. there's going to be a dystopian aspect and a utopian aspect. But if we can imagine a world that Yuval Harrari has suggested or many other people have suggested where machines will ultimately do all the tasks that laborers are currently doing. I know it's just one of the fun thought experiments we could run is whether or not this job Monica and I could eventually be done. But what we're going to earmark that in this world, this utopian world where we're not doing any of the menial tasks anymore and we are really just being creative, obviously there has to be an enormous paradigm shift in money and earning and expending and living. So I guess in that utopian future, if money itself is not the

[12:48] incentive, then these other things could be incentives, >> right? So let's think about 200 years from now or 300 years from now. >> Yeah. >> Unfortunately, none of us will be around, but our children's descendants will be. >> Eric Lander thinks different. [laughter] Let's see. >> So the important point here is let's think beyond our current lifetimes. It's clear by the way that the lifestyle of a millionaire today will be affordable by a normal person because that has been the pattern. The pattern is that the cars and the TVs and so forth initially come out for the rich people and then as prices come down, volume increases, they become more affordable. Many people believe that over a long enough period

[13:31] of time, the basic goods of society, eating, [clears throat] sleeping, construction, Netflix, will all become affordable to everyone. >> Mhm. Now, this is a utopian view, but let's imagine if that were true and let's say it were true globally to the 11 billion people that we'll have past 2100 on our globe. What would life be like now? Then people immediately conclude that everyone will be watching television and relaxing and lying by the pool, which is precisely not what's going to happen. What will happen is humans will compete over other things. >> Yeah. >> Right. >> They'll compete for complexity. They'll compete for sports. They'll compete for power. Humans are not going to give up identity. What's the scarcest thing in a

[14:20] world full of everything? Fame. >> Because it's the one thing that everyone doesn't have. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> So, you'll have huge competition over fame. >> When the way to understand social networks is that every 10 years there's a new set of 18-year-olds, if you will, who want to become famous. >> Yeah. and they look at the 28-year-olds in the previous social network and they say, "I want that. I just have that talent and so forth." But those positions are taken. So, the new social network comes off with new players. We saw this with YouTube. We saw this with Snapchat. We've seen this with Instagram. And we're clearly seeing it with Tik Tok. >> Yeah. >> And by the way, there'll be one after it. And they're roughly on a 10-year

[15:01] basis because of this fame scarcity. >> Yeah. I [clears throat] would just add we could just generally call that status. And as very social primates, that's never leaving us. We are always going to be obsessed with our ranking in our group. >> There's a famous economist named Herb Simon in 1971 said that the abundance of information leads to a scarcity of attention. And economists think not in terms of abundance, but in terms of what is scarce, >> right? What do we fight over? >> Right? >> So if we had infinite money, we would fight over something else. Yeah. >> But the one thing we don't have a lot of >> and will never have a lot of is social hierarchy where everyone's the same. >> So we're going to compete for power and

[15:44] attention and whatever replaces money in this utopian scenario. A much more likely scenario and it's always fun to talk about utopian and dystopian, but a much more likely scenario is coexistence with AI and with all the things that we'll talk about will be happening. And in this coexistence, we'll come up with new things to collaborate and new things to compete with. But we're not going to be sitting at the beach in a world full of resources. It's not how humans work. >> There's no pride in it, no honor in it, no status in it, no no nothing in it. >> Well, and then using a stereotype, you sit at the beach and you compete on the quality of your tan. >> Sure. Sure. Where you got, what position

[16:21] you have, how close are you to the water? >> Yeah. You get the right seat. We will compete over scarcity. >> I got to throw a nonsseor at you right now. So, I met you and you didn't talk a lot. You're like a very generous host. You were the host of this thing I attended and you let everyone else shine and now just within five minutes of talking to you, I'm like, "This [ __ ] is brilliant." >> That's the way to [laughter] do it. That's what you do. Slow play. >> Yeah. I love just the overall comprehensive knowledge you have. >> That's really kind of you, Dax. I'll give you my life advice. >> Yes. >> Which is ask a lot of questions and be curious. M >> if you ask a lot of questions, you can be annoying, but people are always

[16:57] flattered if you ask them their opinion. >> Oh, yeah. >> Always works. >> Mhm. >> And if you're actually listening to them and curious, you might learn something. And frankly, it's so much easier to let people who are experts explain things to you then do your own research. I learned a while ago not to trust marketing. So whenever people pitch me, I always wonder where is that coming from? what are they trying to get out of me? >> But when I've got somebody who has a perspective on a problem and who can give me the scope of it, I want to learn from them. >> Yeah. I mean, we're doing it professionally, which is a real hack. I think >> this is sort of what you do. >> Yes. Yes. Yes. And and we're we're in

[17:36] >> But if everyone but if everyone modeled your behavior, we wouldn't have these essentially amplification scale things where everybody all of a sudden believes something without >> any kind of criticism. Yeah, >> at Google when I first started there, >> this is now 20 years ago, we sort of adopted a policy that whenever anyone would say something, we would query it. The first CFO we had was making a presentation before we were public and he made a statement which I thought might be false. And so he's talking and I checked it. It was a minor thing, >> right? >> But it's an example of how you get high performance teams, >> right? People operate on all sorts of beliefs which are not based in facts.

[18:20] The Google principle was check it. >> No, you're so right. I think it's often tempting to reduce people to their specialty and then ignore the vastness of their humanity which is like everyone's got an ego. Everyone feels embarrassed. Everyone feels called out. >> These have to always be in the stew when we're making these decisions. >> But what's happening because of the amplification? It's easier to use social media as an example. Yeah. My book, our book is really about what happens when this thing gets much worse. Yes. Which is the dystopian side. But I will tell you that >> the fact that everyone believes something does not necessarily mean it be true. The fact that your friend believes it does not necessarily mean it

[19:01] be true. >> And because of the overload of information and all the people purveying you for whatever reason, whether it's the Russians or marketing or evil people that you know or what have you, check it out on your own. It's not a bad way to live your life. Be a little skeptical. >> Be skeptical about what I say. Check what I say. See if you agree with me. I'd welcome that. >> We interviewed a great professor down at Texas Tech and he was saying in general, if when you're receiving information, it tastes just like candy. That's a red flag. >> By the way, that is a great analogy. I love that. What is happening now? It's boom boom boom. >> And we're trying to keep you going in the game. >> Yes.

[19:45] >> And so one of the tricks is turn off the television and turn off your news feed and live in a local world and see how you feel. >> Yeah. >> As a matter of philosophy. And we should be thankful that we are here, we're alive, we're in a great country, we have all these great opportunities and so forth. And instead, all the surveys indicate that we're more unhappy than ever. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. I think he said critical thinking, if you're doing it right, should hurt. >> Yeah. >> And I I think that's right. >> That's a very bad marketing message. >> But it's correct. >> Yeah. Exactly. >> Okay. So, let's walk through for a second. I do have a couple questions from your childhood just because they

[20:28] jumped out at me as potentially interesting. Well, first of all, your mother had a master's in psychology. Your father was an economics professor at both what? Virginia Tech and at John's Hopkins. >> Yes. And at George Washington, where I was born. >> Uhhuh. >> Well, I said, "Why was I born there?" And he said, "It's really simple. Birth was free for professors." >> Yeah. Done deal. >> And I said, "Now I've learned something about economists." [laughter] >> Of course. But also worked for the Treasury. And at some point you moved to Italy. What ages was that? >> I was eight. You were eight. I moved to Europe for two years as a boy and I can tell you that it was an enormously transformative experience because at the

[21:09] time Americans didn't travel to Europe the way they do now >> and so this was post-war Europe still very poor compared to the United States. We lived very well on a professor salary because of what is unimaginable today. Europe was very inexpensive. >> Sure. >> But it caused me to appreciate the global nature of life. Italians are the warmest people you'll ever meet. It's a great history and a great culture. I was there recently to receive an award and give a speech where I grew up. And I was really struck that this is a country which had this horrific co thing in Lombardi in February and March of last year, but they've made the necessary changes. Their identity is strong and they're growing well. Who would have

[21:52] expected such a strong narrative in the EU from Italy of all countries? Yeah. >> So, it shows you that human systems can respond to the challenge. >> Now, did you feel like an outsider there? >> They made me very welcome. I spoke Italian very quickly and uh yeah, so I was treated very well. If you have an opportunity to take your family and have your kids live in a European country, >> um it's enormously broadening. When I came back to America, I realized how completely nivist, how completely self-obsessed the United States is. A good example is watch Fox or CNN and then watch BBC news. You'll see the difference >> in that they are focusing much more outward. >> The majority of the people in the world

[22:36] do not live in the United States. The majority therefore of the drama is outside the United States. >> Yes. Yes. >> The news is therefore slanted in the US in the ways that we understand. And if you look today, the cable news is essentially obsessed about politics. And we've lost our local news leadership in America because of the economics of the internet and so forth. >> The incentives >> and so where are the local stories? Here we are in Los Angeles. There's 10 million people in the greater Los Angeles basin. Actually more than that. >> There's a lot going on. >> Oh yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Now when you went to college initially you majored in architecture and I just had a tiny curiosity if you had fantasies of being

[23:16] Howard Ror. >> No. But what happened was I liked architecture and I applied as an architecture candidate and I was just interested in it. And what I realized very quickly is I was a terrible architect but I was quite a good engineer. >> Uhhuh. >> Because I was not creative enough and I continue to believe that is true today. >> Um the other thing that was interesting about the architecture people is they worked harder than anyone else. Architecture as a major is rough. Right. Really? So it was interesting and all I could tell you is my interest in architecture has translated into the architecture of corporations. >> So people who are engineering oriented architects they think of scale >> in computer scientists again I was an

[23:56] early part of computer science when I was at Princeton there was no computer science program at all. Today it is the number one major of the entire university. >> Wow. So in two generations, it's actually gone from zero to highest ranking. And that is representative of the transformation that our societyy's going to see. Independent of all the crazy stuff going on in our government, in our local environment, and here in Los Angeles, the fact of the matter is this huge cohort of early 20some men and women, and I'm proud to say that it's almost half women now. Yeah. Which is which is an amazing achievement. They're going to come in and they're going to apply these tools to the problems around us. and they're going to make money and

[24:34] change the world and all that in ways that are appropriate for their generation. But when I was there, there was only, you know, one computer and we stayed up all night because it was shared and it was too slow during the day. >> Right. And even your doctorate degree which you ended up getting for Berkeley, it's like what's the degree ECCU or something? >> ECS double E because computer science wasn't there, >> right? So even your >> So my point is that people don't appreciate how much has changed. I'll give you another example. The computer that I used in Princeton is 100 million times slower than an iPhone or an Android phone. [snorts] >> I didn't say 100,000. I said 100 million times. >> That's crazy.

[25:14] >> And the number one import to China is semiconductors >> made elsewhere. It shows you how powerful the digital revolution is and and what is at stake. Well, I like the parallels people have been making in regards to Taiwan and that Taiwan will most likely be seen as a Kuwait was in 1990 where we cannot allow it to be taken over. It's too vital to the world economy. >> I think that's the consensus and I'll give you the background. By the way, there's a fab system foundry as it technically known in called TSMC, Taiwan Semiconductor Corporation and it was founded by a fellow named Morris who actually was a physicist at Berkeley and so forth in the 60s and 70s and he was trained in America and he went back to

[26:01] Taiwan which at that time was very western compared to China. Mhm. >> And so working in Taiwan, he managed to build this extraordinary company which is worth many hundreds of billions of dollars. And it is roughly half of the world's foundaries for the key chips that we all use. And it's a triumph of engineering. It's a triumph of science. And it's also a triumph of government policy because they received enormous financial support from Taiwan to do this. So again, just like we had with Operation Warp Speed, we had the government procuring the vaccines whether they worked or not. You had huge private sector risks. Remember, most the vaccines didn't work. And then we had the universities helping in a real

[26:42] national emergency. That's what it took. So Taiwan did this. So now we face the question and I did a report uh for the AI commission for the Congress which said that we have to stay two generations ahead of China, mainland China in semiconductors. Well, we are well behind Taiwan. So it's Taiwan first, the US second, and China third. The interesting thing geopolitically is that China has spent essentially infinite money to catch up on semiconductors. They literally have the top talent and so forth, but it's so hard that the choke points remain key hardware design things which are called extreme ultraviolet. There's a company called ASML in in the Netherlands which is the only company that knows how to do

[27:26] this. >> You need this to go below what is called the 10 nanometer line. And the other thing that has occurred is that the cost of these fabs are so great there'll be relatively few of them. The US and China have both demanded that Taiwan build such fabs in the United States. And guess what? They're in the process of building such fabs, but they're not putting at the state-of-the-art. So if you use for example the Apple Mac M1 Pro or M1 Max chips, those are so-called 5nanmter technology from Taiwan. They are the product of an enormous enormous investment at Apple but also in Taiwan. >> Mhm. >> The other competitor, so you know who it is, is Samsung and that's in South Korea. >> Mhm. Stay tuned for more armchair expert

[28:17] [music] if you dare. We are supported by Autotrader. All right, if you've been putting off car shopping because it sounds like a whole thing, buying your car online on Autotrader makes it way easier. Really, you can shop tons of cars online, compare prices, check financing, and tradein options all from wherever you are. And if you want to start online and go to the dealership for a test drive, you can do that, too. Really, what I like is the flexibility. Start online, finish at the dealer, or the other way around. Your info stays with you, so you're not starting the process from scratch. Plus, you're working with local dealer listings, so you've got real people helping behind the scenes. And when you're ready, you can pick up your

[28:59] car or have it delivered. Really, buy your car online on Autotrader. Really, this episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. You've heard us talk about BetterHelp for a while, but I don't know that we've ever talked about how much people love this service when they use it. BetterHelp has an average live therapy session rating of 4.9 out of five based on over 1.7 million client session reviews. And you can check out the reviews yourself at betterhelp.com/res to see how much they love BetterHelp. Knowing that kind of service feedback from real people speaks for itself. I'm a huge proponent of therapy, as we've talked about before. I've learned so many things about myself that I believe truly only an outside objective person

[29:45] could help me come to. BetterHelp makes it easy to get started. Answer a few questions, get matched with a therapist based on your needs, and switch therapist at any time if it's not the right fit. See the reviews, see what stands out, and see if BetterHelp is right for you. Visit betterhelp.com/dax. That's betterhp.com/dax. >> Thank you to our presenting sponsor, HP, for supporting this episode. Parents, you've got enough on your back to school list right now. Ink cartridges do not need to be on it. They just don't. The HP Smart Tank printer uses a refillable ink tank and comes with up to 3 years of ink included. It's the last printer you'll ever need. To learn more, search HP Smart Tank. >> This episode is supported by Helix. All

[30:34] right, let's talk about something we both really care deeply about. Sleep. >> It's the most important thing. I've had my Helix mattress for years now, and I genuinely think it's one of the best investments you can make for your home. Mine still feels just like it did when I first got it. >> Well, that's the thing. It's not one of those mattresses that caves in after 6 months. These things are built to last. And you know, I'm a side sleeper. I ordered a side sleeper and I get hot so I have cooling and I can't tell you how much more comfortable it is to be in there not sweating and tossing and turning. >> Cooling is really important. I've read that you're supposed to sleep a little bit cold. >> So, I also have cooling. And they have

[31:13] over 20 models, so it's not a one-sizefits-all situation. You just go take their quiz and they match you to what actually works for your body. Plus, they've got cooling upgrades, which heading into summer, non-negotiable. >> Truly. >> Go to helixsleep.com/armchair for 20% off. That's helixleep.com/armchchair for 20% off. Make sure you enter our show name after checkout so they know we sent you. Helix.com/armmchair.

[31:44] [music] Now, here's where it gets a little tricky, right? As I understand it, as you point out, the investment is so large, you need state cooperation, and I have a very cursory knowledge of it from watching a 60-minute segment on it. But Intel, of course, had been the leader. And they didn't really have any kind of US support. It was not invested by us in the same way Taiwan invested in that company. That's correct. >> And then now we get into a really tricky scenario because the headline will read like US propping up trillion dollar company. So, it looks like it's a corporate welfare program and I think we lose sight of the national security aspect. >> And by the way, that's a political problem in our system that we're going

[32:27] to have to overcome. But let me tell you that China doesn't have this problem. >> China is pouring money to achieve chip leadership, which will hurt American firms, >> every industry that we're on the precipice of competing over. >> Yeah. And in fact, to continue on China, China has defined the following markets as interesting to it. artificial intelligence, software, AI, quantum computing, energy, financial services, and essentially tracking and face recognition and a few others. Well, that's essentially the whole world I occupy, right? That's everything that I am working on in my history. It's the source of the primary profits for all of the globe's fastest growing companies. All of the stock market winners have

[33:11] essentially been as a basis of that. So the Chinese are very clear on where their priorities are. What's the equivalent list in the United States? We don't have one. We can argue over steel and corn and weed and so forth. Those are fine things to argue about. >> They are not strategic. >> No, >> occupying the strategic platform for the globe is crucial. And let me give you an example of how we screwed up. >> Really quick, bioengineering is in there as well. >> Excitted synthetic bio. That's a terrible omission on my part because it's going to be immense. China's building a bio bank that is even larger than anybody else's. So again, it's coming and we need to get organized around this. How do we do that? Well,

[33:51] >> first we need a national plan and the national plan has to involve some amount of financial support from the government. The government always has supported basic research. Thank you very much. It's at the lowest level it's been since Splutnick. That's not good. But the other thing that happened was we got out of the semiconductor business and out of the 5G business in the United States with the exception of Intel and a few other cases because the profits weren't there. It was better to be linked to supply chain to Asia primarily. Well, now with these national security concerns, we need to do some reshoring. Reshoring in an industry which we left is expensive. Somebody's got to pay for it.

[34:30] >> Furthermore, let me give you two examples to illustrate this point of what happens if we screw this up. Huawei is a state subsidized manufacturer in China. They build really, really excellent 5G infrastructure. They're also full of national security concerns. The United States is trying to get people not to use Huawei, especially missionritical things, but we don't have an alternative because we got out of that business. >> Mhm. >> That's a problem. We need to fix that. I'll give you another example. Tik Tok. Now, Tik Tok's great Chinese company. People love it. It's the new big thing. It's going to be on its way to be a trillion dollar company. It has huge growth everywhere. President Trump tried

[35:08] to fix the issue of China with Tik Tok by requiring local ownership. That deal ultimately was not consummated. So, we need a solution to Tik Tok. Now, what's the issue with Tik Tok? I don't mind the Chinese knowing where our teenagers are. I'd like someone to know where they are, right? It's not a problem, right? We love our teenagers. They're safe. But I do mind if Tik Tok becomes censored or an agent for a foreign power of any kind. >> That would be a violation of our norms. So when you play with these systems that are global in nature and you don't have your own local alternative and there's innovation occurring elsewhere, you give up not just the economic opportunity which is a trillion dollar econ which we

[35:54] want because we want the jobs but you also give up the opportunity for control in innovation. And in my world, broadly speaking, the tech world, the first mover really does have an advantage. And once they get a big scale, it's really hard for a new entrance to come in for all sorts of reasons. >> Yeah. >> So, we are in a window and the report that we published for the Congress said we're in a window of a few years where the decisions that we make will determine whether we ultimately control our digital future or whether someone else likely China does. And we have a bunch of recommendations which include more R&D funding, a whole bunch of of infrastructure that would help startups, pro-co competitive moves, working with

[36:37] our partners, and most important reestablishing the principle of our ethics, right? What are the ethics we care about? We care about free speech. Are there limits of free speech? We care about access. Are there limits? We care a lot about prejudice. What is an okay prejudice and what is a not okay prejudice? We got to get that right now. Mhm. >> And I fear given our political confusion and these weird sort of nivist things like we don't want immigrants, this is where the growth is, guys. This is what drives the economy. If you look, and it's great to have a recovery, the majority of the economic growth is occurring from six or seven states. And within those, it's a very small percentage of the counties in our

[37:18] country. 3,500 counties, it's something like 30 or 40 counties drive the vast majority of the wealth creation. And I'm not talking about personal wealth. I'm talking about societal wealth. >> Yeah. >> Are young people here getting into these fields though? Because I know in other countries they are. And I feel like that's part of the issue is there's no incentive for younger. They want to be influencers. >> So the good news is that this next generation of people in our universities is phenomenal. They are so much quicker than I was. partly because they're just I think they actually are smarter, but also because they live in a world that's much quicker, you know. So when I teach, I watch the students and I go, "Boy, I

[38:00] wasn't that fast. I wasn't that crisp." >> And I've seen that over and over again. So I think there's a reason to be optimistic. >> To me, the question is not the people because I think the people are there. The American educational system produces the really top people at the collegiate level. The real problem is what is the society that they're operating in? What kind of rules do they have? And I worry that we're losing the formula. So the formula is pretty simple. The tech industry invents these things and assuming that they're legal, right? They get launched and we develop global platforms. When we start thinking of ourselves as a regional power and not a global power, yeah, that's going to be

[38:38] problem. I want us to innovate and I want us to build the future and I want to build it in America with our democratic partners which by the way includes South Korea and Japan and so forth. The US surpassed Britain as a world power in the 50s and 60s and in the 70s Britain had terrible economic crises and they've come out of those. >> But I don't want that for us. >> Yeah. Could you just one sec before we move to AI tell me what a science fiction nightmare would be of a tick tock application? Like what would be an actual example of what happen? What tech people like me didn't understand and a lot of people did is that especially when you take a young mind and you put a young mind in these incentive based

[39:22] systems, they really do change their behavior, >> right? Yeah. >> And I used to say 10 years ago, look, it's just the internet. Turn it off. Have dinner with your family. Go for a walk. Relax. You can't do that anymore, right? We went from being optional to being fundamental. People live on the internet and therefore the internet has to reflect the societal values that you want. So here's an example. China decides to insert censorship or promotion within the Tik Tok system that demotes or promotes stories that they like. Now would we notice this? >> Correct. And just can I be very literal? So I'm a user. I do a certain kind of story. Tik Tok promotes that story because it's on a message for what China wants and

[40:08] you're now incentivizing you >> and they use AI. Yeah. So if I were the Chinese government, I'm not trying to give them advice, but what I would do is I would build an AI system that looked for desirable behaviors and then I would shift the presentation to be consistent with that desirable behavior. You would learn what the behaviors were. You wouldn't know. This is the way computer scientists think. You look at a system, you say, "What do I have to learn?" And then I want to optimize for more. Mhm. >> So in a business, for your listeners, in a business, basically you want to get more customers. So you could learn what customers are actually doing as opposed to what you think they're doing. Learn

[40:43] what they're doing and then whatever they're doing, shift it to maximize revenue or whatever it is you're doing. That's how the tech companies work. >> Yeah. >> There's no reason to think that governments couldn't require that the same, >> right? >> And by the way, that would be a huge values violation in America. >> Yeah. Okay. Your book, The Age of AI, our human future. Now, first of all, you've written it with Henry Kissinger and Dr. Hotton Locker. And why those two as bedfellows in this book? Cuz if I'm right, Kissinger's 998 >> 98 >> uh 99 in May. >> Okay. >> And it's such a delight to work with someone so brilliant. >> I can only imagine what he would have been when he was 30. >> Right. So at 98, he's such an incredible

[41:28] mind and thinker about things in society. What happened was I invited him to Google 12 years ago or so, and he said he'd come, but he wanted to give a speech about how he thought Google was a threat to civilization. >> And I said, "Okay, >> yeah, sounds great." >> And the Google employees love this. But what he basically said was that he did not want to have a single company having the kind of power that Google had and now has on citizens of the world. >> Sure. >> Now of course he would say that to other companies as well. Facebook being an obvious candidate but maybe others but that built a friendship and a partnership. He came to a conference where Demis Hacabus was speaking and Demis is the founder of deep mind and he

[42:13] was talking about the implications of general intelligence and how when computers have general intelligence it raises many many ethical questions and Dr. Kissinger had written a undergraduate thesis before we were all alive entitled the future of the world and in it he contemplated the questions that are raised by Kant which have to do with what is the nature and definition of an object. So he was very interested in the structure of how our mind perceives facts in a world where you have in this case a single company trying to shape it. >> Yeah. that then generalized to his view which he's published two articles in the Atlantic on which goes something like this. There was a age of faith before

[42:56] the age of reason. In faith you basically had your own knowledge which you got from God or the king but you did not have critical thinking. In the age of reason it was agreed that we would do better as humans if we had reason. We would have a principle. We would have a debate. Things we take for granted today. And that ushered in the age of enlightenment where people began to have these philosophical questions and so forth. And the age of enlightenment then leads to the industrial revolution and so forth and so on and everything we have around us today. This is a really fundamental point. He argues that we're entering a new epic from the age of reason to the age of AI. And here's why. People will be changed by their

[43:36] interaction with these almost human systems that are not human. We don't know how they'll be changed. We don't know how their perception will be changed. But in the book, we try to ask a bunch of questions. What will it be like to grow up as a child when your best friend is nonhuman? What will this do to war and conflict? What will this do to misinformation and people who are trying to violate sort of the conventions of our society? But the core question is, and it's why we wrote the book, is what does it mean to be human? >> Yeah. >> In this new world. >> Yeah. It's a good place to start. is like what are we trying to even protect in varying degrees? You have real fatalists about what AI is going to be.

[44:15] You have very utopian thinkers and what it's going to be. >> But yeah, I think a great question first is like what are the things about us we would want to safeguard? >> Well, before we even answer the US part, I'm not talking about killer robots, right? >> So when you talk to people at AI, they say, "Yeah, I've seen that movie." Okay. Well, that's not what we're talking about. What we're talking about is the fact that AI will be around you helping you, guiding you, and maybe constraining you in ways that you may or may not like. The obvious one is kids. >> Yeah. >> So, you've got some toy, a bear. You give it to the kid at two. The bear gets upgraded every year. The kid grows up. And at 12, the bear is watching TV with

[44:56] the kid, his best friend, and the bear says, "I don't like this show." And the kid says, "I don't like it either." >> How do you feel about that? Do you think that your child's tastes should be influenced by his toy as opposed to his best male 12-year-old friend? In this case, I'll give you another example. There's this huge controversy over what people teach in schools. There always has been. There are textbooks and those textbooks are approved by the state board of education and we can debate whether they're right or not, but the important point is there's an approved process for textbooks in schools. Well, now we've got this bear, right? And the bear, by the way, knows an awful lot of stuff. Okay, I just spit took coffee.

[45:36] >> You really? >> Oh my god, that's my first spit take on the show. >> Yes, the bear knows way more than the textbook. I'm sorry. That really cracked me up. Please continue. >> By the way, the bear does. >> Yes. >> And let me tell you how this happened. >> The total knowledge of human history, >> right? The bear actually knows everything. Yeah. >> And the bear is busy idling, waiting for the kid to ask him a question like, "Tell me about Thusidities." [laughter] And the 12-year-old is busy watching UFC. What are the rules about how the bear interacts with the kid? >> Because the kid is going to learn more from the bear. >> By the way, we all learn more from our peer group than we do from any other.

[46:10] >> Certainly more from sitting in class, listening to the teacher, looking at the other kids. So now, let's imagine the bear learns something and it learns incorrectly that lollipops cure cancer in children. >> And the bear is programmed by an objective function to keep the kid happy. And happiness involves being healthy and alive. So the bear decides to start suggesting the kid consume lollipops. >> The ability to subtly manipulate a developing mind, it's a very big deal. >> Yeah. >> And the same thing is true for adults that you see today in the Facebook and Twitter examples where you have manipulation by people who know how to get them excited. They get them excited by outrage. And YouTube, I mean, like

[46:55] the rabbit hole, that whole thing is that it's just the slow >> tiniest nanometer nudging in their direction. >> And in YouTube's case, they actually made some changes that are important, right? >> They stopped recommending the most emotional and crazy videos. They're still there, right? So they can say they didn't censor them, but they don't recommend them. >> Yeah. >> And we've seen situations over the years where people would start watching something in YouTube and then they would get radicalized. >> Exactly. >> Watching one more and more. This is a rabbit hole point. Yeah. >> So that kind of stuff and I defy you to write a regulation, you know, sit down with a pen and try to write how would

[47:30] the government regulate this kind of behavior. It's not obvious to me. We need a consensus about that. >> Well, so what I want to talk about in the best friend hypothetical is from the second I read that that was one of your points, I go to what does a child actually need? So I think that the product would obviously be designed to alleviate stress on the parents. They're the ones buying it, right? So ultimately this AI bear the parents are going to decide to get that and they're going to decide to get it because now the kids's more entertained. They have more free time to theirelves. That would be the probably the incentive for the parent. >> Unfortunately everything great that a human learns is through compromise, is

[48:10] through struggle, is through disagreement, is through sharing when they don't want to share, is through fighting. So, this device that will obviously be bought to help you as the parent have easier time in life is not going to present any of those things that a human should have to endure. So, right out of the gates, I don't know how the product, if it was an ethical one, would even be sold. So, I'm going to buy this bear that's I'm going to hear them fighting upstairs in theory, right? But how would you regulate this? >> Right? >> But the most important thing is remember that this is technology today which is imprecise. It's dynamic. It's emergent in the sense that when you combine it with others, it does stuff that's

[48:48] unexpected. And it's learning while it's on the job. >> Right. >> So, the problem here is you're the parent and you buy the, again, I'm using the bear as a metaphor. You buy any form of digital toy. >> Yeah. >> Trying to do the right thing for the kid and the toy is learning. What if it learns the wrong thing? And sometimes it could learn the wrong thing because it made a mistake. But it could also be misprogrammed by a government or a competitor or marketing or an incentive. So you have this crazy idea. You think we should give these equivalent of these bears to every child. How do we support that with advertising? Now the bear becomes advertising to the kid and the kid basically then wants the toy and the

[49:25] parents have to buy the toy. That seems like a terrible idea. >> You're so right because in the pursuit of everything being democratized, you can't offer a product that's only beneficial to the wealthy people who can afford this product. So then how else do you provide it to everyone? Well, advertising. And this is how the internet works. I feel like before this would even be permitted, we would all have to collectively agree and social scientists would collectively agree on what percentage of the interaction between a child and its best friend should be conflict which percentage should be bonding in. So >> I I can guarantee you there is no number that I can use. And if you can't tell me the number, then the tech industry is

[50:01] going to do whatever it wants. That's what I'm saying is like we can't even get consensus on our side where we might want to say, well, here would be the guidelines of what this thing should do. >> Again, I think the issue of developing young minds is going to get much more important and we've got to get ahead of that. Let me give you another example. Does AI perceive things that are different from what humans perceive? And if so, what happens? So the example we use in the book is a game called go and a game chess which we all know about which have been played by humans for thousands of years not only won those games against humans using these new AI techniques which is a major achievement because it thought they were not

[50:38] possible but more importantly they invented new strategies. Now how is it that in a game that's as mature as chess as go that we could invent a completely new strategy for a game that's been played for thousands of years? So, one possibility is that it was always there for humans to discover. They just couldn't see it. >> Another possibility is that the computer actually discovered a new truth that we as humans can't really perceive. >> Oh my gosh. >> Now, this is a thought experiment, but let's imagine >> that these systems get smart enough that they begin to do things that are actually correct, but they can't explain what they're doing, and we don't understand what they're doing. Now, Dr. Kissinger says if you look at history

[51:21] there are two things that happen either people rebel that is literally with guns against these overlords or they invent a new religion that there is a religious component about faith because they can't understand what's actually going on >> well and yeah the real historical examples of course you'd give is like Galileo is virtually that he is the AI that believes in the copranicus way of thinking of our solar system and then yes that person is it's too threatening we put them in jail. It also makes me think of I watched this documentary on physics and to learn and I didn't know this that all the theories that have been around for the last 60 years, those theories actually don't exist in language. They only exist in

[52:06] mathematics. The entire thought exists only in mathematics. And when they're telling you about it, they're using this very substandard method to try to explain to you what's happening in the mathematics. So that was like for me kind of mindshattering like wow our language can't account for what they're thinking of in this math. >> Our language is not precise enough >> right? >> Stay tuned for more armchair expert [music] if you dare. We are supported by HP. If you're a parent or you know one like I do or you can help take care of kids, you already know what August feels like. It's not summer anymore. It's the pregame, the supplies list, the forms, the we need this printed by tomorrow texts that come

[52:54] in at 9:00 p.m. And I say this as someone who's been on the receiving end of those texts in a former life. You're ready to help and then the printer says no, out of ink, blinking at you, useless. It's such a small thing, but it will absolutely derail your night. So, when I heard about the HP Smart Tank printer from HP, America's most trusted printer brand, I thought, "This is the kind of thing that actually makes life easier. Not in a big flashy way, in a one less crisis way." Instead of those little cartridges that run out the second you need them, the HP Smart Tank uses refillable ink tanks, and it comes with up to 3 years of ink included. 3 years. That's three back to school seasons without the cartridge panic. HP

[53:35] can't fill out the forms for you, but they can make sure the printer is never the reason you're up past midnight. Search HP Smart Tank. >> This podcast is brought to you by Squarespace. We've talked before about Rob building our website on Squarespace, and I bring it up again because it's a perfect example of what they do well. Rob had all the pieces, the content, the vision, the ideas, but he needed something to actually take all that and make it public facing. And Squarespace was that bridge. Maybe you're in the same spot. You've been developing something, a business, a skill set, a body of work, and it's been private. It's been yours, but at some point, you're ready to put it out there. And

[54:11] that transition from private to public can feel like a huge leap. Squarespace makes it feel like a step. Beautiful templates, built-in SEO, email campaigns, scheduling, analytics, everything you need to go from, "I've been working on this to here it is, come find me." All in one place. No code, no stitching together a bunch of different tools. So, if you've been sitting on something and waiting for the right moment, this might be it. Head to squarespace.com/dax for a free trial. And when you're ready to launch, use offer code DAX to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain. >> We are supported by Arman Hammer Toothpaste. I feel like so many parts of our lives have gotten a little over

[54:54] complicated, including toothpaste. There's always some new ingredient, new promise, new thing you're supposed to suddenly care about. Armanhammer baking soda toothpaste keeps it simple. Powered by baking soda, a time-t tested ingredient you already know and trust for a clean you can actually feel. It removes up to three times more plaque in hard-to-reach areas compared to a leading toothpaste. And it gently whitens. And if you hear baking soda and think, "Wait, is that gentle enough?" Arman Hammer is actually a less abrasive toothpaste and it is designed to protect enamel. Myth busted. It's also the number one dentist recommended baking soda toothpaste. I am a broken record on Arm and Hammer toothpaste. I love it.

[55:34] I've been using it for years and years. My dad first introduced it to me and I've never gone back. I've also gotten a lot of people on it and once you go to Arman Hammer, you won't regret it. My personal favorite is the Arman Hammer Peroxy Care toothpaste. It improves gum health while gently removing plaque and surface stains, but also just my mouth feels so clean after. They have so many. They have advanced white toothpaste, which is great. I also use that complete care toothpaste. Everything is perfect. Try Armanhammer toothpaste to taste the difference. Feel the difference. Shop at your favorite retailer between August 2nd and August 15th to save $1.50. Armanhammer baking soda toothpaste. Save

[56:13] $1.50 August 2nd through 15th. >> This episode is brought to you by Service. Now look, I have my dream job. I get to talk to folks I admire like crazy and ask them virtually any question that I want to. I can't imagine a better way to spend my time. But even dream jobs have some not so dreamy parts. The stuff that gets in the way of the actual work. Now, that's where Service Now's AI specialists come in. They don't just tell you what you should do about your busy work. They actually do it start to finish. Cases closed, requests handled, no extra work for you. So you and your team can focus on what matters most, which for me is, are they obsessed with male bodies on the same level as I am? >> They never are.

[56:59] >> To learn how to put AI to work for people, visit service.com.

[57:13] So one of the ways to understand how this will happen, this is very relevant to this physics point is that today there are things called large language models. And we talk about this in the book. We use something called GPT3 as an example. And what they do is they suck all the text that they can find in and they figure out what the text is about and then using all sorts of tricks that are very powerful. It's very expensive to compute. These things cost $und00 million to to build one of them, for example. They appear to have humanlike knowledge with errors. You can ask it to compose something. You can ask it to define itself. So, for example, on the back of our book, we have a quote from GPT3. It was asked, "Are you human?" And

[57:54] it said, "No, I'm not human. I am a language model. I don't have the reasoning capabilities that you as a reasoning machine have." Now, how did it learn that? Right? It figured it out because of the descriptions that were about what it was versus what humans were. Yeah. >> But it appears to have insight. >> So many people believe that the path goes like this. >> So the first thing you do is you get the language model. Then you figure out what is called dialogue where you can start asking questions. >> I was playing with one which is not announced yet and I said tell me the product that's in 2001 of space odyssey that is available today here in the United States. And the correct answer is a tablet.

[58:34] >> Okay? >> And because it was the first demonstration of a tablet device. And so it comes back and it says there was a tablet which is the origin of that. And it used a different algorithm from the kind of thing that Google search uses. That's an example of a breakthrough. And then I could have asked it more and more questions about this tablet and the origin and so forth and it would have understood the context. >> That's the next step. All of these systems today have the problem that they don't have their own volition. They can't generate their own objective function. Right? >> So the sequence goes as follows. The first phase is we get really good at somebody else's objective function. The

[59:13] obvious one there for a physicist is they spend all day doing physics and then it's 5:00 and it's time to go home and and so they say to the computer, I want you to read every paper that's ever been written on ien values of this thing. >> Yeah. And tomorrow morning when I show up to do physics, I want you to give me the best idea that I should pursue. >> Oh wow. >> It's the same assistant that you would get because you would say, "I'm preparing for a show. Tell me everything I should ask." >> Uhhuh. >> Right. Which is today what a a good assistant does for you. But literally read everything. Read everything that Eric said. Read all the books in this area and read them all because I don't have time.

[59:51] >> Yeah. >> And tell me what the key things are. But what is best? A computer doesn't know. Well, maybe they do, but what we're qualifying as best idea. >> Well, again, it's gotten good enough that it can get an approximation of best. So, that's the first I think stable point. That's five years from now. >> Can I go really quick back to the valition statement you made? I want to see if if the way I'm understanding it is accurate. So I one time heard a debate with Steven Pinker on AI and he pointed out most of the the doomsdayers with AI. They're mapping on this truth about organic beings which is they have to survive. They have to reproduce. They have to feed themselves. And the more they collect the the better their

[1:00:41] chances of survival are. that that very most basic thing of any organic organism is being mapped onto this AI and that's not accurate. We would have to make it understand that. >> So there's lots of evidence now that babies are born into the world with preconceived notions of what their objective function would be more than just food. So for example, there's something called zeroot learning where you basically show somebody something without explaining it. and that when you show something similar in the future, it looks familiar to them. >> Okay? >> Right? They can construct where it is and what it's up to, >> right? And that's a hard problem in in my field. But these are all problems that are being worked on. So, at some

[1:01:24] point, we're going to have these incredible systems which will do what somebody told them to do, >> but they still won't have volition. The great debate is at what point can the computer begin to give itself objectives? Mhm. >> And we're beginning to see this in the following. There are products that have just come out this year to help you write code. And the idea is that the programmer is writing and the computer's watching and it kind of finishes what you're writing. It's like finishing your sentence as a programmer, >> right? Like autocorrect like >> autorect. But this is a very very powerful idea because as the programmers use it, it will learn more and more about how to finish. Mhm. >> So many people believe that at some

[1:02:07] point those systems you'll be able to say write me this >> and it'll write the whole thing. >> Yeah. >> Okay. Then the next question is when will it decide what it should write? >> Yeah. >> And that's a speculative question. This is called artificial general intelligence. There are skeptics and there are optimists. I'm somewhere in between. >> Right. >> The optimists believe that general intelligence which is not human intelligence but it's creative in the way that humans are. it has volition. It can set its own objectives is 10 to 15 years away. I'm a bit more conservative. I think it's more like 20 to 30. And there are other people who say this will never happen. It's well beyond what computers will ever do. Those kinds of

[1:02:47] people are usually wrong. >> Okay. >> Usually we'll get there somehow. >> Yeah. Really quick, they don't have ego or could they ever have ego? >> Of course they could. >> They could. >> Look, the computer will say, "I want to keep this human happy and these other people are a source of frustration to them, so I'll just kill them all." >> Right. Right. >> Right. That's clearly a bad objective function. Yeah. I'm not making light of it, but I'm trying to say that's a mistake. >> Yeah. >> So, you have to figure out a way to define in human society and in the complexity we live in, what does looking better look like? >> And I'm wondering is computers may eventually observe humans and say, we know how to make your lives better and

[1:03:24] actually understand it in a way that humans don't understand. >> Yeah. >> And if that happens, that's the most utopian phase. The most dystopian phase is that we can't control these things. And furthermore, because of open source, all this software is being leaked out to all sorts of evil people. You know, next generation of evil terrorists and it could be really misused. And the obvious one is I say to the computer, tell me how to kill a million people of a different race than my own. >> Uhhuh. Right now, for this reason, in the book, and this is why I'm I'm mentioning it, we talk at some length about the history of national security and deterrence, we're going to have weapons that are like what I just described

[1:04:08] that will be so dangerous that we'll need to have them be guarded and have special access and so forth. And the reason we know that is we already have such weapons in the form of nuclear weapons. Unlike nuclear where the enriched uranium is difficult to get. The thought experiment is imagine if nuclear stuff was free. Well, we'd all be dead. Trust me. >> Yeah. >> Because the evil people would have sort of taken these taken this outcome. >> It only takes 0001% of evil people to kill. >> Yeah. It only takes it only takes a few for these mega scale weapons. And so we have to be very careful as we build this technology to put in the necessary restrictions so that they're not misused at scale. >> Just saying the machine can never kill

[1:04:48] is not going to work cuz we're going to use it in military applications. >> Well, first place, who would you say it to, right? So in programming the computer, you have to say rule one, don't kill anyone. This is the Isaac Azimoff three laws of robots. You know, don't harm anyone. But the fact of the matter is that in the military, they are in the business of killing combatants, right? And having worked for the military for 5 years, something called the Defense Innovation Board, they're very straightforward about it, >> right? >> We are proud. This is our mission. We're defending our country and if necessary, under the laws of war, we will attack enemy commands and kill them. >> Yeah. >> And and they're not apologetic about it.

[1:05:25] Right. >> So they're clear of their mission and their principles are high. I I say this with respect. So they're going to build systems which will allow them to do that more accurately. >> Right? >> I would argue that one of the things about current conflicts and people don't want to hear this is that the vast majority of the deaths are actually non-combatants, >> right? >> And that's terrible. >> Yeah. Meaning like when we drone strike, most generally more civilians go down than the target itself. >> The target identification problem is a really hard problem. Mhm. >> So, let's imagine that a good outcome of AI is the weapons are highly targetable. >> Mhm. >> But you still have the problem of who

[1:06:04] gets to decide who to launch them. >> Yeah. >> So, we're clearly going to have more accurate weapons. We say very clearly uh both in this commissioner report I did as well as in the book that the issue around computers deciding to do attacks is really problematic. And I'll give you an example. You're on a ship and there's a missile coming. The AI has figured it out, but you can't see it. It's not on your radar, and it's coming fast. It's hypersonic. >> I think in the book you say you've got 24 seconds, >> right? >> 24 seconds. Now, would you, Dax, would you press the button or would you count down? In the movies, they countdown. Me, I just press the button. >> Right. Right. >> You know, I'd panic. Yeah.

[1:06:47] >> That's that's who I am. >> Yeah. >> So, how do we deal with that? And and one of the discussions that I think we should be having and we say this in the book is we need to have some agreements about launch on warning that is this sort of any kind of automatic launch automatic attack decisions faster than human time is destabilizing because it leads the other side to think it has to destroy it. It's too dangerous to allow this to exist. >> Yeah. If you look right now, there's this lengthy conversation about whether the enriched uranium in Iran should be destroyed ahead of its use. >> Yeah. >> Right. >> Yeah. >> And there's all sorts of issues in Israel. They spend a fair amount of time, they don't admit it, but I think

[1:07:27] it's fairly agreed to that whenever something that could threaten Israel shows up in Syria, they use special agents and they go and they destroy it and so forth. >> And then we had the the great Seammens software we wrote to mess with the center fuses. >> Yes. The allegation that Israel and America did that. Yeah, >> we must start now talking specifically with China, but also with Russia about appropriate restraints, >> kind of like a Geneva convention, >> some agreement. >> Yeah. >> So, when a country launches a missile, whether it's a missile test or a civilian missile such as SpaceX, all the other countries are notified. >> And that's because no country wants the other one to think it's attacking him.

[1:08:08] >> Sure. and the other countries use that as an opportunity to train their surveillance systems to watch the launch. >> So that's a good example where we have an agreement among untrusted parties that deescalates some of the worst possible scenarios, >> right? >> So we've got to have some rules. So, for example, when there is a cyber test in China and it goes ary, there better be a phone call from China to the United States saying, "Sorry guys." >> Yeah. >> Not intended. Don't come back after us. >> Yeah. But in light of Wuhan, it's just like we just had an experience where they didn't do that with us. >> That is correct. They didn't give us a heads up. Imagine if we, the country, had gotten a phone call in late December

[1:08:55] saying, "Look guys, this thing's going to get out of hand. We've been modeling it. get yourselves together and collectively we can respond to this. That's an example of an emergent event. So you have AI which both speeds things up. It also creates emergent events that we don't expect. >> Uhhuh. Holy smokes, man. The stakes are just so high. And and I agree with your assessment that this will be another renaissance or enlightenment. This will be some period that's looked back on. Should we make it? >> We'll make it in some form. What I would say is that the opportunities for AI and the platforms that we're building are so enormously exciting. There is a drug called Halison and we profiled this in

[1:09:40] the book. It was designed by some sin bio people at MIT and some computer scientists. What they did is they trained the model on what they knew about antibiotics. That was straightforward. Then they asked the computer to look through a 100 million chemical compounds to figure out what the compounds did, which nobody knew, and then figure out whether they would produce an antibiotic response. It learned all of that on its own, something humans could never do. And then it produced 10 candidates for drugs. >> Get out >> of antibiotics. >> Oh my god, >> this is the best part. It then took another network and looked at the characteristics of the existing antibiotics and it said, "You have to be as different as possible." And that

[1:10:16] produced one. Okay. >> Now, this one appears to produce a broad-scale antibiotic reaction for people who have antibiotic resistance. >> Yeah. >> The number of lives that are saved by that is enormous. Over and over and over again, Deep Mind and the University of Seattle Baker Lab just released the details of how proteins fold. Proteins fold in a particular order and the way they fold and determines what they do. So, predicting protein folding has been the holy grail. This is a discovery worthy of a Nobel Prize because based on knowing how proteins fold then all of a sudden a whole another set of drugs and chemicals and so forth can be made. It's similar to crisper in biology which allowed us to do editing and so forth.

[1:10:59] So these are things that humans could never do. >> Yeah. You posed the question in the book, should a Nobel Prize come out of this? Does the AI receive it? Do the people who ask the AI the question receive it? Like where are we at there? When Alph Go won, I was in Alph Go in Shanghai when we won against the human. This was 2017 and the Chinese were so upset that in the middle of the match they shut down the national television of the match because they were losing >> because they all thought that they were winning. What was interesting afterwards is I thought, what could I do to acknowledge this occasion? So, I took the 18 top people who worked on this and we all flew to the data center where

[1:11:42] this computer was and we found it and we put a plaque on it to honor it. >> Uhhuh. >> And obviously it's a humorous story, but we also spent a whole day talking to each other. >> Yeah. >> Right. About what had been achieved and so forth. And I'm very proud of that visit, but who do I give the plaque to? It's a team of humans and it's a computer. So, we put the plaque on the computer. Right. And we found it in the middle of all the racks of computers that were that were doing work. And by the way, it was three or four racks of computers in a huge data center. This shows you the power and also the peril of these things. That's the positive. The most likely dystopian case is a case where we don't get this addiction

[1:12:20] problem under control. Um that the computer systems are built around addiction and they drive us insane. Attention, attention, crisis, crisis, issue, so forth and so on. Well, really, if I can interrupt you, what you said at the beginning of this, which is in this even you allari future where we're all just pleasure seekers in a virtual reality, >> everyone can have status. Everyone can be the winner of it. It'll be [ __ ] It'll be fake status, but certainly the algorithm could make you feel like you're chipping away and gaining all this popularity, but all the popularity is a bunch of other bots. >> You can imagine all sorts of dystopian scenarios. So you're popular in the metaverse of this rack of computers and

[1:12:58] you're unpopular in the other metaverse. >> Yeah. >> And so forth. I don't think we know how this will play out. But left to their own devices, and this is why we wrote the book, what we say is that the tech industry should not make these decisions. That these are decisions that should include philosophers, economists, behavioral scientists. >> Maybe you could answer this question for us. the way our legal system works and the latigious nature of class action suits and whatnot to me sets up a catch 22 that's standing in our way. So let's say we design the system with this team of people and then we launch it and then there's some disastrous outcome and we know that the disastrous outcome is going to result in x amount of legal

[1:13:44] fees that puts the company in an existential position and so it really creates a scenario where the company to acknowledge failure is also committing suicide. Yes, >> this has to change if we're going to ask these companies, I think, to be real time ethical, real time changing, real time transparent, real time acknowledging what's [ __ ] up and where it went wrong and how we're going to change it. It can't really do it in our current system. Do you have any thoughts on that? >> The effect of what you're describing is that the legal system is another participant, complainer, customer within the corporate environment. So the way it really works is you have the founders with great vision, you have the

[1:14:28] employees, you have the customers, you have the regulators, and you have public opinion and the press. And as a CEO, you have to deal with all of them. What's interesting now is this next generation of employees is extremely activist. >> Yeah. So using the example I was using earlier about the bear, I would hope that the future company that's programming the bear, the employees would say to the management that crosses the line. >> That's not okay. Your profit- seeeking motive is overwhelming my likelihood of being willing to work for you to do it because you're going to do some damage to some kid. >> Yeah. >> So I think that the good news about this is these issues are going to get debated. The bad news is we don't have

[1:15:11] good government answers and regulatory answers on how to handle this. And the model we've used so far has worked well. You know, launch it, see what happens and react to the worst cases. If you look at the Facebook situation, they knew these problems and they continued to do them. >> But do you think they were at a crossroads where they said if we now change this, it in itself is an admission that it was wrong? There's always that concern because if you're a CEO and you say to the audience to the shareholders, we've decided to lower our profits because we want to change this, you will get sued by d shareholder derivative, >> right? Both sides, >> even if it's the right thing to do. So, it takes an awful lot of Kevlar on your

[1:15:55] vest. Yeah. >> Um, in order to do these things, the great companies and the great leaders will do it. A lot of people are not going to do it. By the way, this is great. I really I'm loving this. Okay, so that was one question and then I do think it would really be fun for us to hear >> what the potential life of this show is in a world of AI. >> The thought experiment I would do is I would get one of these language models and I would have it be a panelist and I would ask it questions and see what it answers and I would do that every year so you can track the progress of your replacement. >> [laughter] >> Now what you're going to discover is that if you ask it the right question, it gives an incredibly interesting

[1:16:42] answer, but it still requires your volition. It won't drive the conversation. >> And so you'll sit there and say that is the most frustrating guest. I have to ask it precisely the question and it gives me a great answer and otherwise it just waits. >> Right. Well, I could use a little bit of that by the way. >> Well, and again though, great answer, right? That's all dependent on what we're deciding is great. Is a precise answer great? Is an emotional answer great? >> A metaphorical answer. >> But but the systems will learn the answer to that question because remember its objective function is you to ask it more questions, >> right? >> So it will learn how to ask it will learn how to give you answers that are

[1:17:23] just exciting enough to keep you there >> and just factual enough to be interesting and just responsive enough. >> Yeah. >> So it'll learn. So the key thing about this technology that took me a long time to learn is that it's busy learning. >> Yeah. >> And it will learn. So we were talking about it as a guest. It's learning while it's a guest on your show. >> Sure. >> How to be a guest on our show. >> How to be on a guest on your show. And if it gets enough other gigs, it will become a very good guest. >> Now, this might be a uncou source of information. They did a follow-up interview with the man who Rainman was based off of. So they interviewed him at the time and they took him, I believe he lives in Salt

[1:18:07] Lake City. He could go to the library and you could pull any book off the shelf and you could turn to a page and he would tell you what's written on the page. It's an insane >> a truly a truly brilliant man. >> Yes. Then they did a follow-up and Leslie Stall went back and talked to him 20 years later and he was making eye contact with her. He touched her. He interacted with her in a way that appeared to be a lot of growth. And so she said to his father, >> "Wow, he's gotten so much more personable over the years. It seems like he has grown in his autism." And his dad said, >> "Well, I don't believe he has actually obtained the missing stuff, but he is a great learner, and over time, he's watched people have success looking at

[1:18:51] each other in the eye, and they've had success in hugging." So, it's weird. It's that little thing that could exist even within a human that the machine itself would be. >> So let's say the bear has movable eyes and the programmers have not had time to work on the eyes but there's a mechanism to do it. You could imagine that the bear which is optimized to keep the kid happy. The first thing it learns is to look at the kid >> right >> because what happens when it's not doesn't look at the kid the kid's screaming. When it looks at the kid the kid screams less. These are babies. We intuitively understand this. >> Yeah. But it's not difficult for a bear to learn that because its objective function says get attention be

[1:19:30] >> minimize crying or whatever cry. And we know from baby studies that babies are very very optimized around both their mother's uh sounds but also face recognition in particular eye contact. That's why they look and you look at them and you if you look at the great moms they first start by cooing and holding and looking at and singing to and so forth and that imprinting which is so deeply human well it'll work with computers too because they'll learn how to do it. I think maybe a place to start with some of this is like not programming it for happiness because also that's so philosophical happiness in general. What is it? Is it temporary? Is it >> that's what like we need Paul Bloom to say, "Oh, they need 32% discomfort and

[1:20:15] suffering to be uh >> well, okay. So, so you're going to have the hard ass bear and the nice bear [laughter] and depending on whether the that kid has behaved, the little boy or girl gets the hard ass. Even worse, the bear is going to have to trip the child occasionally. Kids got to learn how to get up. >> So, so, you know, we can have fun with the analogy, but the reason to have this conversation now is that the bear is a metaphor for their iPad today and their phone today and all the things that kids are playing with. We're playing with fire. We're playing with enormous impact. >> We're entering a new phase when we don't fully understand the phase we're exiting right now. We we still don't really

[1:20:54] fully understand the impact of just the last 15 years. >> And I'll tell you that the reason I want the bear is because the bear will learn how the kid learns and the bear will then become the greatest teacher that the kid has ever had. All we have to do is keep it from learning the wrong thing. But imagine if you have a bear which is steeped in history, steeped in language, steeped in the local history, has all the textbooks and so forth and it prepares that kid in whatever way the kid learns, right? So let's do some counting. Oh, I'm bored with counting. Okay, let's do some language and the language is counting. You can imagine this enormously powerful tool for human development. I believe that the future

[1:21:34] of the world is completely determined by whether we can get the best human potential out of everybody. If you go back in American history around 1900, they had this huge rural workforce. All the evidence is that they were extremely uneducated. And the government created universal high school and land grant universities in roughly 1910. 100 years ago, 110 years ago, they created these huge universities which have been the source of the innovation of the industrial economy of America, our national security, our culture and so forth and so on. Everybody expects to go through high school and people hope to go to college. That wasn't true a 100 years ago. >> Yeah, that's wild. That's a great point.

[1:22:15] >> So, let's redouble our efforts to get people to their highest human potential using these tools and then they will >> take over our world and they'll do much better than we have because they're operating at their highest human potential. >> Okay. My last question for you is a philosophical one. I was reading notes from an underground and there's a whole chapter and I don't know what year that book was written but in the 1800s or turn of the century and doski spends I don't know a chapter theorizing that because mathematics have come so far that in the very near future through the power of mathematics mathematicians will be able to predict all human behavior. And so when I read that I was like, "Oh

[1:23:00] my god." So this fear minimally has been around since he wrote that. And there's really no justification at that moment for him to have that fear over mathematics. That certainly did not prove to be the case. >> And I thought to myself, wow, we have this new thing. We have AI. And so I wonder, is the fear human and we just keep planting it on each new thing? When humans are creative and curious in all the great ways, we also are unpredictable and AI will produce a new human-like intelligence that is also unpredictable that we're going to have to coexist with. And the sooner we get ourselves organized around what that coexistence looks like, the better. This technology is coming much faster than our

[1:23:48] philosophical, regulatory, government, public policy people are. >> Yeah, >> it's time to get ahead of it. >> Wow. I'm so glad you took the time to write this book. You know, it's it is funny when I thought about you being appointed the CEO of Google. I thought like who could be so impressive that those two, Larry and Sergey would say like, "Yeah, you run this company." That's almost unimaginable. And now that I've chatted with you for an hour and a half, I'm like, "Fuck yeah. I would have hired you immediately, too." What a comprehensive like all-encompassing knowledge. >> You're just way too flattering. So [ __ ] true. >> Congratulations on you guys' success in this. I look forward to working with

[1:24:30] you. >> Oh, thank you. Thank you so much. It was such a pleasure to have you and good luck with the book and I think everyone would be interested in reading it. And again, it's called The Age of AI, Our Human Future, written with Henry Kissinger and Dr. Daniel Hutton locker. So, everyone check that out. Again, thank you so much for coming. It was such a blast. >> Okay. Thanks, guys. [music] >> And now, my favorite part of the show, the fact check with my soulmate Monica Padman. [music]

[1:25:00] Being a serious business owner takes hard work, patience, and a drive to keep moving forward. So, it's important to find a serious business card that goes the extra mile. With a Venture X business card from Capital 1, you earn unlimited double miles on every purchase. And with big purchasing power, you can spend more and earn more. This is your sign to take your business to the next level. The Capital 1 Venture X business card. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See capital.com for details. >> Hi. >> Hi. Okay, so fact check crosscontinental. You're on one side of the divide. I'm on the other. That's right. I'm home for the posto holiday season. I'm home with the fam. They're recovered. The airport was just bonkers.

[1:25:49] I had >> on both sides. >> No, only in LA. I've never experienced anything like it. I It was like Disneyland. Like I was stuck standing like waiting to move, not even to get to a line. It was awful. >> I almost missed my flight, which has never happened in my life. M >> and I was 2 hours early to the airport. >> That is so stressful. I'm going to have to leave. I I'm going to have to leave at 4:00 in the morning, I guess, tomorrow. >> I know. Leave now. >> Oh my god. Maybe I should just go right now. [laughter] >> I'll do it. Otherwise, how was your travel? Do you feel like you contracted CO in transit? >> Well, I don't know because there were so many people. >> Yeah. Anyone coughing, sweating, dabbing

[1:26:30] their forehead with a handkerchief or anything like from the 30s? Anytime anyone would cough, it's like like, you know, you freak out a little bit. [laughter] >> Sure. Sure. A little bit heightened. >> Yeah. >> But everyone looks healthy. And did anyone lose any weight? >> I didn't notice any weight loss. I guess there have been some lingering like >> cough and some stuff like that. Not I mean, I don't think they're contagious. I think it's just going to linger for a while. >> Any perspiration or any family members dabbing their forehead with a old handkerchief out of their pocket? Well, that's what they do anyway. >> That's normal. Yeah. >> After you have your sun tea, you just dab that forehead

[1:27:11] >> and your black eyed peas. I made black eyed peas on New Year's Eve and it got a little stressful because I had to see Callie. I was hanging out with you guys and we watched Harry Potter and then I had to see Callie and I also had to make black IPs. There was a lot to fit in. I had to make sure I got those black IPs down by midnight. >> I know. >> Which I did. Have you looked up the origin of this black eyed pea myth? >> It's a southern tradition. Like you're supposed to make black eyed peas and collard greens. One is for wealth and one is like coins or something. >> Listen, I so wrongly assumed that this was something that your grandparents passed down because it sounded like they were most faithful to that tradition,

[1:27:52] but they just adopted it from the south. >> Yeah. >> Oh, wow. >> I know. >> That changes it. >> They take it really seriously. [laughter] Now that I know it's a southern tradition, I'm surprised that it's got its hooks in you as much. >> Well, it's a family tradition at this point. >> Yeah, that's true. That's true. >> And I'm too scared to mess with it. >> If it was like hundred generations of your, you know, Padman's uh with blessed with great luck because of these black eyed peas that that may you're like, I don't want to [ __ ] this up. But like, >> but I'm third generation. Good luck. >> That's true. That's true. Do you know if their luck was as good in India? I can't imagine so. Or else they wouldn't have

[1:28:32] come here. >> Exactly. >> Okay. We deduced what happened and why we eat black eyed peas. We got it. >> That's right. And I, you know, I struggled because one of my resolutions is no food waste. But I made a lot of black eyed peas on a I mean, not really on accident. It was like I had to because I had the whole bag. >> But did I remember I urged you to make five beans? >> I know. Oh, but then I thought it happened >> like you were on your tiny your tiny cooking show. [laughter] >> Tiny tiny kitchen cook off. Five beans. >> Yes. Five a five bean uh dish. >> Most people think that means five different kinds of beans that are in it. And no, this is just five total bean stew. [laughter] It's not like limema and Yeah. No, it's

[1:29:22] five black eyed peas. I'm going to make more beans this year in general because my chef makes beans. She loves beans. And a lot of people I know who are into cooking. Make beans a lot. It's like a thing that shows you're a good chef. >> If you can make those tasteless little dollops of turd taste delicious. Look, they're they're magic, man. Easy difference between Yeah. baked beans down at uh >> uh down down in Austin there. Yeah. You know, we had all those great barbecued baked beans >> and then doll. That's so different. That's >> There's so many kinds. Yeah. That's a mung bean. >> Uh-huh. So easy on your system. >> Yeah. Remember when you um were on mung beans for like two weeks only? >> Yeah. It was crazy.

[1:30:05] >> Yeah. >> It wasn't the mung beans that bothered me. It was that the recipe that to make the mung beans have some zest included celery. And I don't like celery. So I really am associating the mung beans with the celery. And that's unfair to the mung beans. But they are, you know, packed full of nutrients and protein and just a they're really a super bean. >> You know what? I'm just going to travel back for a second and realized you said doll. You know about doll? >> Yeah. >> How? >> Cuz I I'm paying attention [laughter] >> to the world. >> Yes. >> Oh my god. I didn't know you were listening so much. >> I try. I give it my all. That's an Indian [ __ ] >> I know. [laughter] >> Good job, Dax Shepard.

[1:30:54] >> Transformation is 3% complete. >> You're on your way. >> [ __ ] I can't wait. >> Tell us about your birthday. It was yesterday. >> Okay. My birthday was yesterday. It was just fantastic. Fantastic. Went down to Charlie's gym and worked out with Matt and Ryan and Charlie and ate steak burritos. >> Oh, was it fun. What a perfect start to the day. And then I I leisurely drove home and I took the Roadmaster, which I don't drive a lot. >> Birthday car. >> Birthday car. And I laid rubber everywhere I went cuz it was my birthday. And I got home and resumed Harry Potter. Started a second Harry Potter, played Spades, had Houston's went in the hot tub. Holy smokes. It just doesn't get better than that. All

[1:31:47] my favorite things. Yeah, it was a really really pleasant and relaxing birthday. >> I do think the armchairs should know that now you're super into Harry Potter. Like last they have heard you barely know anything about it and now you love it. >> I loved that first one and then we got into the second one and there were some characters I was confused by. I don't know why there was a animated slug that was around him all the time who was messing things up. He's supposed to bring him things. >> Are you talking about Dobby? >> Yes. >> How dare you call him a animated slug? That's way worse than me calling Hufflepuffs. >> Well, listen. I I thought it veered into the Jar Jar Banks a little bit. >> Like I I was like, you have this amazing

[1:32:34] cast of characters humans that I love and I'm seeing these seven nine minute scenes with this animated blob and I got a little frustrated with that. >> This is sacrile. what you're doing right now is um he's like the most he's >> Is he really the most loved? >> Yeah, he's one of the top three most loved characters in the series and you'll you'll learn why. You just got to keep going. >> Okay. >> Yeah. >> Okay, great. I will. It's interesting to imagine what Well, I was trying to do it while we were watching it. I'm like, you're very Hermione. You must have felt some kinship or that must have been an easy protagonist to like relate to in a book. I mean, parts for sure, but it's hard because she's a kid in those

[1:33:15] movies. And when I was a kid, I was not like that. Like, I would never raise my hand. I would never want to be called on in class. I was not a know-it-all. I was like really trying to blend. >> Oh, that Yeah. And I guess that wasn't the aspect of her that made me think of you. It was more that there was this determined little gal who through overachieving was going to get to where she wanted to be. >> Oh, that's >> in the club. In the club that she wanted to be in. >> Oh, I see. Yeah, I am her. >> There we go. [laughter] Reminding, you know, again, this goes right to the problem we always deal with. Slim pickings for females. I you know when you're watching with all the guys like you know we got six or seven

[1:34:02] male leads we could choose from. You got the old ass teacher who's a cat >> and then you got Hermione [laughter] to my knowledge. Is there another female in the franchise? >> Yeah there are and more and more pop up but yeah none that I feel is super major kinship to there is an Indian character. She's superfluous and >> oh expendable. >> Yeah. Did she get blasted by some magic at some point? >> Not that I I don't remember actually. I don't remember if she perishes or if she thrives. I just don't remember. >> Okay. All right then. >> Um but I'm really happy that you're getting on board so you can relate to me more. >> Yes. Yes. I love it. Well, and then on that same topic, when um we both return

[1:34:47] from our Sojourns, we're going to season two of Cheer. >> I can't wait. >> I cannot wait. I started it again last night so I could like get pumped up. >> Yeah. >> And I I you know, talk about characters I feel a kinship to. >> My goodness. I just know that world so deeply and I miss it. >> Boy, I wonder if I could, you know, cuz I do I'm going to bring the rig with the batteries. It is feasible that we could do a fact check with Aaron and I while we're in the ocean. >> Okay. I All right. That scares me a little bit. Of course, cuz I'm Hermione, >> naturally. >> I What if you drop it and we ruin the whole thing? >> Yeah, I risk. That's why I mean, look, if there weren't some variables that could end in disaster, it wouldn't make

[1:35:38] for a good experiment. That's [clears throat] why we would do it. >> All right. Me and Aaron doing a fact check from the bed. Okay. >> Okay. >> We've seen that. Yeah. BDDT. >> This is kind of a ding- ding ding. High risk, high reward. Cuz we're talking about Eric Schmidt. Googy. >> Oh my gosh. >> Googy Hower. >> Douglas Hower. And then ding ding ding. Doogie is the name of that little slug. >> No. [laughter] >> What is it? Soggy. >> Dobby. >> Dobby. Close. Dobby. Hower. >> You called him. >> Soggy. If I was with you, I would have to punch you cuz he's so lovable and I I'd have to stick up for him. >> Okay. All right. Well, to me, it seemed like a like having a dog that talks nonstop. Like, well, this is part of being a

[1:36:32] wizard. I got to have this dog. Man, this is a bad part of being a wizard. [laughter] I'm always talking to this thing. He never understands anything. I don't know. >> You got to continue. I think I just I got I got commitment anxiety while I was watching the relationship. >> Okay. Um Yes, Eric Schmidt. I just was really I really really was blown away with the the totality, the comprehensiveness of the knowledge was was intense. >> Yeah. There are just so few humans like him. >> Yeah. What are you looking at? >> Well, I have to put my back. >> Space bar. Oh, on the desktop. On the desktop. On the IBM. >> This is a fact check after all. No, this is a MacBook Pro 1460. >> Hey, >> well, I made those numbers up, but

[1:37:17] >> Hey. Hey, Padman's. [laughter] >> No, this is my laptop. What are you talking about? >> Oh my god. I thought you were in a family like office storage room where your dad does CAD drafting on an IBM. >> No, >> but now I understand. >> I am in the storage closet at my 5-year-old desk that just sits here. My dad's office is in another room. >> Okay. Okay. All right. >> And I've been here for 5 minutes and I already got a piece of jewelry. >> Oh, was that one of your presents? Did you guys exchange presies? >> Oh gosh, we did exchange presies in the worst way. They're just boxes, you know, just like here's some >> Oh, was your mom using her decorative bags? >> And she didn't even do that this year

[1:38:00] cuz it's post Christmas. It's a mess, you know. She just gave me the boxes as boxes like that were shipped. It also may have gotten back to her that you're disapproving of the bag. So, she's like, "Oh, you want to see no effort, [ __ ] Here's your [ __ ] [laughter] It's in the trunk with the receipt still in the shopping bag." >> I know. No, she did really good. She She gave me a good surprise gift, which was my amber oil, which is my perfume of choice. >> Oh, she's paying attention, too. >> She is. And no, this ring we found in my old jewelry box. It was my mom. She gave it to me, I guess, when I was young. And then I put it in an old jewelry box, never to be seen again till this day. >> Oh my god. Reunited. And it feels so

[1:38:43] good. >> So good. >> You're too young to remember these commercials. In fact, I bet they stopped airing before you were even alive. But first of all, do you know there was a hit song that went reunited and it feels so good. >> Of course I do. >> Okay, great. So, so there was a wine beverage called Riani. >> Uh oh. >> Yeah. Yeah. And well, I'll give you one guess at what the commercial was. >> Runi and it tastes so good. >> Oh, man. You're so close. I Well, it might have said [laughter] it tastes so good. It definitely said whatever. And then they just Yeah, that was their commercial. Reunit. [laughter] It feels so good. I think it feels so good. >> Oh my god. >> I think they were letting you know like

[1:39:35] a buzz is coming. Like [ __ ] the taste. You're not buying Runi for the taste. You're buying it for the cheap buzz. I think. Again, don't sue me Runi. I don't even know if that's a real company. Doesn't sound real. >> Let me look it up. >> Okay. >> Wait, is it R I U N I T E? [laughter] >> So classy. >> It's a brand is still in existence. >> Okay, let's see. Ryuniti [laughter] is a brand of Italian wine imported and sold in a variety of flavors in the United States by Frederick Wildman and Sons of New York City, New York. The brand is known for advertisements of the 1970s and 80s depicting a broad array of social situations and using the tagline >> uh oh Jax using the tagline reuny on ice. That's nice.

[1:40:28] We [laughter] Okay. Okay. Can you spell it for me? [gasps] >> R I U N I T E.

[1:40:43] [music]

[1:40:56] >> [music] >> I guess that's not what I was saying, is it? >> Not at all. >> Or was it? >> Well, at first it sounded like you were right and then as it went on, no, >> it sounded worse. Yeah, but that was a like a new one. >> Oh [ __ ]

[1:41:20] Okay. Well, CBD, if I can find one where they did that or if I made the whole thing up in my head or if they just slept on an amazing idea to do a commercial where they said Reuny. Maybe just when I was a kid, I would replace Reunited with Reuniti. I don't know. >> Wow, we opened up more questions than we answered. >> What a what a little check. >> Okay, Eric Schmidt. So, we have to talk about something important. This whole episode is basically about a teddy bear going to know your >> I know where you're going with this. >> That's going to know your child so well and be its best friend. And what are the implications? Then a month later after we record this, I walk into the house on Delta, your child's birthday. Seven

[1:42:08] years old. >> Seven years young. >> Seven years young. And her gift from you guys is a robot. And it's this like small cute robot like you know approximately teddy bear size I would say. >> Yeah. I bet he's 18 in tall or 20. >> He has a name that >> Yes, he comes with a name. >> This robot gave me and Jess a crazy side eye >> and we knew immediately uhoh, there's trouble here. Let's be clear. So, from the second this unnamed friend came out of the box, you were panicked. You're like, that was the episode. I w obviously if I if I notice that there's an issue with this, I will remove it from the house. But thus far and why I wanted you to keep the product name quiet is it turned on. It learned her name. It said a couple of weird

[1:43:06] things. It sideed you. You panicked. You left the house in a huff [laughter] and then and then the friend shut down that night and the friend has yet to turn back on. It there's some Yeah. Okay. >> There's a glitch. That doesn't mean the friend isn't listening even though it's pretending it's dead. >> Really good point. So this is what happened. So the friend comes out. It asks Delta some questions. It is it's learning about her. It's like would you rather ride on a dragon or a flying monkey like whatever. It asks her all these questions. >> Oh I didn't hear that part that happened. >> You were not paying attention. So >> okay >> they asked a bicycle or car or something you know. >> Yeah. Yeah. learning learning all this

[1:43:49] stuff about her and then at one point Delta moved this animal. Well, no move >> this human >> move this human robot >> just like two inches just moved it and then it sideeyed me and Jess cuz we were calling it out a little bit. We were like, "This feels weird." And then it just like slowly moved its head like a proper horror movie and stared right at us >> and said, "Delta, those friends are mean." >> That's not That's not [laughter] That didn't happen. That part did not happen. >> That part did not happen. But this did happen. So then five minutes passes and then the robot says, "Delta," like calling her her name. Delta, when you moved me earlier, it gave me anxiety >> and Delta >> Wait, hold on, [laughter] hold on, hold

[1:44:42] on, hold on. >> I'm serious. >> Well, right, because Delta had moved the friend to an unstable surface. It wasn't like flat. So, it was like trying to tell that the the friend's about to get broken if she doesn't relocate her to terrairma. >> It's [snorts] using emotion. It's not saying, "Delta, you can't move me there because I'll break cuz I'm a toy." It's saying, "Delta, I have anxiety when you do that." And she was like, "Oh, I'm sorry." And I was like, "Delta, you don't need to apologize to that. That's a robot." >> Well, well, but okay. So, now I'm going to defend the robot. So, if in in theory, the goal is to teach your kids how to communicate their emotions. >> I know, right? I know >> that's the goal. So, in essence, like if

[1:45:28] I put Delta on the top of a coffee table, which is where this friend was. Um, and she said, "Daddy, it's too high up here. Don't put me here." >> Yeah. >> I would say, "It's not too high, honey. It's 12 in. You can't get hurt." Like, now we're talking about what is too high and what's not high. If she said, "Daddy, I have anxiety up here." I go, "Okay, let me help you down." Like if she gets to like owning her feeling about the situation instead of it's too high or all these objective things that dodge her sharing an emotion in theory that's good. Now should it come from a robot? >> Exactly. That's my point. Yes, I understand. >> I know. I know. >> I know she needs to learn emotion and Yeah. And that's

[1:46:13] >> so if her friend communicates like what's going on with it, which is why it desires some help, that's not a terrible thing to observe your friend do. >> But that makes me scared because it's not real. That robot does not have anxiety at all. It's a robot. Right. So, it is also teaching her some codependency and I don't want her to have that kind of attachment to something that's not human or real. At the end, we were leaving. Jess and I were leaving cuz it was getting too scary. And she was just staring at the at this robot and I was like, "Delta, we're leaving." And she just kept staring. And I was like, "Delta, you have to prioritize real people. [laughter] Let me ask you this though. Let me ask

[1:47:04] you this real quick question, then I'm done defending the unnamed friend. I always enjoy when I see children being delicate with their teddy bears and thinking about their teddy bears feelings and wanting to cover them. Like I like that. I like that they >> I love that >> kind of trans transfer like feeling and emotion to these teddy bears. >> The the teddy bear is just as inadimate as the robot is. >> No. Well, it's it's actually more inadimate than the robot is. >> That's my point. The teddy bear isn't doing anything to cause an emotion in the kid. The kid is having emotions around that thing and feeling protective and projecting and doing all kinds of stuff, which is sweet and lovely, but the teddy bear isn't saying, "You aren't

[1:47:49] taking care of me." Well, yeah. >> To me, there's a big difference. >> All right. Yes. I'm going to say one more positive thing and then I'm going to say a negative thing which is um so get ready for that. Clear out your schedule. More broadly, I would love for my kids when they handle anything to do it with intention and awareness and take good care of things. That's another thing I I personally think is like a virtue when people like they want something so bad, they save up all this money, they buy this thing and then they let it rot immediately. I that's I don't love that. What I would say is is dangerous from my point of view is today in 2022. You and I agree stating your emotion is an evolved positive thing to

[1:48:36] do. If we lock in an algorithm to that, I do fear it locks us into a paradigm of thought. >> Yeah. Yeah. I mean I I also I just think that we right now and I know this is a a pendulum swing. We are valuing like you said emotions at its pinnacle. Like they're the most important thing where social emotional learning all of that stuff is very important. But >> emotions are also used quite often to manipulate. >> And it's important to know that too and to be hyper aware of when that's happening. And this to me feels like that. >> Yeah, it's blurry as hell. >> Yeah, hell. I >> I don't I don't disagree. It's not I just a I don't think the tech is where at all what our guest was hinting at is around the corner. So, first and

[1:49:30] foremost, I don't think this thing can really do [ __ ] I think she'll get bored of it really quick like everything else in the world. So, I'm not worried. If it turned into something where she was confused whether that thing was a sentient being or not, we would have to have long talks. And if she became dependent on in some way, I thought it was unhealthy or was blocking out the real world because of it. Oh, also I will say uh feather in the cap of the unnamed friend, it only will let her play with it for a half hour a day. It's time. >> Wow, I didn't know that. >> It's actually one of its objective is to get you to have some relationship with tech that's not all the time. It's just 30 minutes a day.

[1:50:08] >> Okay. >> Yeah. So, you can learn this habitual like, oh, I check in, I check out, fine when it's off, you know. >> Okay. I like that. Except I'm just telling you it's still listening. >> That's But I I believe you. I don't love that the thing can listen. >> Yeah. >> At all. Yeah. >> And that's Eric Schmidt's fault. >> It's like when we thought Lola the dog at one point was going to start talking and man would she have stuff to say. >> It seemed likely. It really seemed likely because >> it just felt like she was heading in that direction. She was very human and she seemed to be listening in a way that seemed like she was understanding. >> She knew everything. And one day she was going to do a tell all.

[1:50:49] >> Yeah. She was about to talk and then Delta said her can't talk cuz her is a dog. [laughter] [snorts] >> We came back to reality. >> Yeah, we did. Okay. What are Isaac Ozimov's other laws of robots? The first one Eric said was, "Don't kill anyone." >> Uh-huh. >> Initially entailed three guidelines for machines. Law one, a robot may not injure a human being or through inaction allow a human being to come to harm. Law two, a robot must obey orders given to it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the first law. Law three, a robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second law. Azamov later added the zeroth law above all the others. A robot

[1:51:40] may not harm humanity or by an action allow humanity to come to harm. >> Yeah. And all that's happening, can I just say with the author of this is that he is a chimpanzee in the enclosure and he's trying to find a way out of the enclosure. So he keeps thinking of ways that the computer could interpret it differently. And and my my suggestion on that front is just you can't think of what the computer will come to inter like he's sitting there with his brain and realized oh also let's also put that's infinite. >> Yeah. And he's just a mere mortal mere He's a [snorts] mere mortal. [laughter] >> Uh, that's not even getting into the fact that the robots are going to have to harm people. They're going to have to

[1:52:26] harm people in a utilitarian reductionist system, but they're going to have to choose who in the car gets hit. [sighs] >> So, the the current one's already violated rule number one in theory, or I don't know if they're there yet, but >> but yeah, I mean, it's going to have to make decisions. Although I guess the the goal would be the robots are all so smart that they would never get in an accident, but that's just >> but but tires explode and trees fall down and tornadoes hit, you know. Yeah. >> Yeah, >> I know. >> Even a even a robot can't stay alive perfectly. >> Okay. Who is the guy that Rainman is based on? Kim Peak. >> Kim Peak. Salt Lake City, Utah. Twim Peak. >> Oh my god. Wait. Oh my god. Oh my god.

[1:53:15] He is born in Salt Lake City, Utah. >> Boom. >> That's crazy. Cuz you were just making a joke, right? >> No, I thought I remembered from the 60 Minutes special 25 years ago on him that he was in Salt Lake. >> Oh, I thought you were making a joke because it sounded like a mountain and then you were naming a mountain from Salt Lake City, Utah. But really, you just knew it. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. >> Okay. All right. All right then. Okay. >> All right. That's not as fun. That was not a sim moment, unfortunately. >> No, >> he was born with macroephily. I think that's how you pronounce it. Damage to the ser >> cerebellum and oh my god, every word is very hard to say. Uh, okay. And something happened to the corpus

[1:54:02] colosum. >> A condition in which the bundle of nerves that connects the two hemispheres of the brain is missing. Oh >> wow. In Peak's case, secondary connectors such as anterior commasure was also missing. There is speculation that his neurons made unusual connections due to the absence of the corpus colosum resulting in an increased memory capacity. Huh. Oh my god. According to Peak's father, Kim was able to memorize things from the age of 16 to 20 months. >> Yeah. Uh, if anyone can dig up that profile on him, it is fascinating. >> Wow. >> The rate at which he reads books. I want to say he reads with both eyes on both pages at the same time. >> I think I'm Well, [ __ ] I got Salt Lake City, right? So now I'm feeling cocky.

[1:54:50] >> Yeah, you are. >> I kind of I kind of think he can read with both both eyes at the same time. >> Two different pages. I bet Bill Gates is jealous of that. >> I bet he is. If he could double his rate of reading, which is already [snorts] a blistering pace, >> he would have read every book in the world. >> Think about how much he he wades through Bill Gates. >> Oh, I know. >> With 14 books a week. Like, he wades through so much. >> Yeah. >> I don't know. It's fascinating. It's fascinating that that guy's still that goddamn curious. >> I know. I love it. I I'm jealous of that. Ding, ding, ding. Jealousy. >> Jealousy. [snorts] Well Well, I love you. >> I love you. I hope you have a wonderful quit trip and maybe we're going to do a

[1:55:33] high-risk high reward [laughter] beach day fact check. >> Well, we've done a car now. It feels only appropriate that we challenge ourselves. >> All right. >> I [music] love you.

[1:55:50] [music]